Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Arctic MX-7 vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme: Comparison

Arctic MX-7 and Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme differ on recommended use: Arctic MX-7 at Mainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU (marketed for CPUs, GPUs, consoles and laptops), Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme at High-end CPU/GPU.

Specs

Specification
Arctic MX-7 (Carbon-Based/Non-Conductive/ULTIMATE Performance Successor to MX-6)
Arctic MX-7
Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/12.5 W/mK/High-Density Filler Pad)
Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package Size2g, 4g, 8g tubes; 4g also sold bundled with 6x MX Cleaner wipesSold in cuttable sheet sizes and thicknesses
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU (marketed for CPUs, GPUs, consoles and laptops)High-end CPU/GPU
Safety NotesNon-conductive and non-capacitive; volume resistivity 1.7x10^12 ohm-cm, breakdown voltage 4.2 kV/mmCut to size with scissors; non-conductive
Paste SegmentStandard PastePad

Price comparison

RetailerArctic MX-7Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
Arctic StoreView on Arctic Store
AmazonView on Amazon
Best BuyView on Best Buy
Thermal GrizzlyView on Thermal Grizzly

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste