Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-5 vs Thermalright Odyssey: Comparison
Arctic MX-5 and Thermalright Odyssey separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-5 at 8.5 W/mK, Thermalright Odyssey at 12.8 W/mK, 34% in favour of Thermalright Odyssey. They match on electrical conductivity and safety notes.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based | Silicone-Based Pad |
| Brand | Arctic | Thermalright |
| Model | Arctic MX-5 | Thermalright Odyssey , Odyssey |
| Thermal Conductivity | 8.5 W/mK-34% | 12.8 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 2g, 4g, 8g, 20g | 85x45mm (0.5/1.0/1.5/2.0mm), also 120x120mm and 120x20mm sheets |
| Recommended Use | CPU/GPU/Console Coolers | Mainstream CPU/GPU (GPU, RAM and SSD gap-filling) |
| Reapplication Interval | Not consistently published | Long-term stable, not a wear item |
| Safety Notes | None | None |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Pad |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Arctic MX-5 vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad
- Arctic MX-5 vs Rosewill RCX-TC001
- Arctic MX-5 vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Arctic MX-5 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Arctic MX-5 vs Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80
- Alphacool Apex 2 Thermal Paste vs Thermalright Odyssey