Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-6 vs Gelid GC1: Comparison
Arctic MX-6 and Gelid GC1 differ on compound type: Arctic MX-6 at Carbon-Based, Gelid GC1 at Silicone-Based. They match on 5 other specifications, including thermal conductivity, electrical conductivity and safety notes.
Specs
| Specification | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based | Silicone-Based |
| Brand | Arctic | Gelid |
| Model | Arctic MX-6 , MX-6 | Gelid GC1 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 8.5 W/mK | 8.5 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 2g / 4g / 8g / 20g tubes | ~3.5g syringe |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU (mainstream to upper-mid builds) | Everyday CPU/GPU Cooler Installs |
| Reapplication Interval | 8+ years | Not consistently published |
| Safety Notes | None | None |
| Curing | Non-Curing | Non-Curing |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Arctic MX-6
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Gelid GC1
- Arctic MX-6 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Arctic MX-6 vs SilverStone TF02
- Arctic MX-6 vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Pro
- Arctic MX-6 vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad




