Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Arctic MX-6 vs Laird (Laird Performance Materials) Laird Tflex HR600 Series Thermal Gap Filler Pad: Comparison

Arctic MX-6 and Laird (Laird Performance Materials) Laird Tflex HR600 Series Thermal Gap Filler Pad separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-6 at 8.5 W/mK, Laird (Laird Performance Materials) Laird Tflex HR600 Series Thermal Gap Filler Pad at 3 W/mK, 65% in favour of Arctic MX-6.

Specs

Specification
Arctic MX-6 (Carbon-Based/8.5 W/mK/Non-Conductive/Best Overall Value/8+ Year Longevity)
Arctic MX-6
Laird Tflex HR600 Series Thermal Gap Filler Pad (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)
Laird (Laird Performance Materials) Laird Tflex HR600 Series Thermal Gap Filler Pad
Compound TypeCarbon-BasedSilicone-Based Pad
BrandArcticLaird
ModelArctic MX-6 , MX-6Tflex HR600
Thermal Conductivity8.5 W/mK3 W/mK-65%
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package Size2g / 4g / 8g / 20g tubes229 x 229mm sheet, 0.5mm-3.0mm thickness options; also sold pre-cut for M.2 SSD/laptop use
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU (mainstream to upper-mid builds)Laptop-Thin-GPU, Mainstream CPU/GPU, M.2 SSD cooling
Reapplication Interval8+ yearsNo reapplication needed; reusable silicone elastomer gap filler
Safety NotesNoneNon-conductive silicone elastomer; no special handling precautions required
Paste SegmentStandard PastePad

Price comparison

RetailerArctic MX-6Laird (Laird Performance Materials) Laird Tflex HR600 Series Thermal Gap Filler Pad
Laird / Laird Performance MaterialsView on Laird / Laird Performance Materials
Amazon (Deal4GO cut-to-size)View on Amazon (Deal4GO cut-to-size)
FarnellView on Farnell

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste