Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-6 vs Prolimatech PK-1 Nano Aluminum: Comparison
Arctic MX-6 and Prolimatech PK-1 Nano Aluminum separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-6 at 8.5 W/mK, Prolimatech PK-1 Nano Aluminum at 10.2 W/mK, 17% in favour of Prolimatech PK-1 Nano Aluminum. They match on electrical conductivity, pump-out resistance and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Arctic | Prolimatech |
| Model | Arctic MX-6 , MX-6 | PK-1 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 8.5 W/mK-17% | 10.2 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 2g / 4g / 8g / 20g tubes | 1.5g, 5g, 30g syringe options |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU (mainstream to upper-mid builds) | Mainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU |
| Safety Notes | None | Non-electronically conductive, non-corrosive |
| Pump-Out Resistance | High | High |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
| Spec Score | 6.8 | 4.6 |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Arctic MX-6 | Prolimatech PK-1 Nano Aluminum |
|---|---|---|
| Prolimatech (Manufacturer) | View on Prolimatech (Manufacturer) | |
| Amazon | View on Amazon |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Arctic MX-6
- Arctic MX-6 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Arctic MX-6 vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Pro
- Alphacool Eisfrost Xtreme Liquid Metal Thermal Paste vs Prolimatech PK-1 Nano Aluminum
- Arctic MX-6 vs SilverStone TF02
- Arctic MX-6 vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad