Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-6 vs StarTech SILVGREASE1: Comparison
Arctic MX-6 and StarTech SILVGREASE1 separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-6 at 8.5 W/mK, StarTech SILVGREASE1 at 3.195 W/mK, 62% in favour of Arctic MX-6. They match on electrical conductivity, safety notes and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based | Metal Oxide/Ceramic-Silicone |
| Brand | Arctic | StarTech |
| Model | Arctic MX-6 , MX-6 | StarTech SILVGREASE1 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 8.5 W/mK | 3.195 W/mK-62% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 2g / 4g / 8g / 20g tubes | 1.5g re-sealable syringe (also 5-pack, 20g tube) |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU (mainstream to upper-mid builds) | IT Technician/Reseller CPU-GPU Servicing |
| Reapplication Interval | 8+ years | Not consistently published |
| Safety Notes | None | None |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs StarTech SILVGREASE1
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Arctic MX-6
- Arctic MX-6 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Arctic MX-6 vs Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK
- Arctic MX-6 vs SilverStone TF02
- Arctic MX-6 vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad