Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut Extreme: Comparison

3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H and Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut Extreme separate most on thermal conductivity: 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H at 3 W/mK, Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut Extreme at 73 W/mK, 96% in favour of Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut Extreme.

Specs

Specification
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H (Acrylic Pad/Non-Conductive/3 W/mK)
3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H
Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut Extreme (Liquid Metal/Conductive/73 W/mK/Built for Larger Dies)
Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut Extreme
Compound TypeAcrylic-Based Pad (non-silicone thermally conductive acrylic polymer)Liquid Metal
Brand3MThermal Grizzly
Model5590HThermal Grizzly Conductonaut Extreme , Conductonaut Extreme
Thermal Conductivity3 W/mK-96%73 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingConductive
Package SizeDie-cut shapes and rolls (e.g. 25.4 x 25.4 x 0.5mm squares, sold in packs)1g syringe
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU and general electronics gap fillingDelidded-Direct-Die (GPU and vertical mounting)
Reapplication IntervalNo reapplication needed; self-adhesive one-time applicationLong-lasting once applied
Safety NotesNon-conductive acrylic pad; no special handling precautions requiredLiquid metal: electrically conductive; do not use near exposed aluminum or bare-die edges
Paste SegmentPadLiquid Metal

Price comparison

Retailer3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590HThermal Grizzly Conductonaut Extreme
AmazonView on Amazon
NewarkView on Newark

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste