Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Akasa AK-455 vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme: Comparison

Akasa AK-455 and Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme separate most on thermal conductivity: Akasa AK-455 at 2.4 W/mK, Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme at 12.5 W/mK, 81% in favour of Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme.

Specs

Specification
Akasa AK-455 (Metal Oxide/Ceramic/Non-Conductive/2.4 W/mK/OEM-Popular Budget Compound)
Akasa AK-455
Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/12.5 W/mK/High-Density Filler Pad)
Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
Compound TypeMetal Oxide/CeramicSilicone-Based Pad
BrandAkasaThermal Grizzly
ModelAkasa AK-455Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
Thermal Conductivity2.4 W/mK-81%12.5 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package Size1.5g and 5g syringesSold in cuttable sheet sizes and thicknesses
Recommended UseCPU/GPU General CoolingHigh-end CPU/GPU
Reapplication IntervalLong shelf stability before application; no in-use interval publishedReusable; no reapplication needed unless physically damaged
Safety NotesNoneCut to size with scissors; non-conductive
Applicator IncludedSpatulaNo
Paste SegmentStandard PastePad

Price comparison

RetailerAkasa AK-455Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
Thermal GrizzlyView on Thermal Grizzly

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste