Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Akasa AK-455 vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme: Comparison
Akasa AK-455 and Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme separate most on thermal conductivity: Akasa AK-455 at 2.4 W/mK, Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme at 12.5 W/mK, 81% in favour of Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme.
Specs
| Specification | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Metal Oxide/Ceramic | Silicone-Based Pad |
| Brand | Akasa | Thermal Grizzly |
| Model | Akasa AK-455 | Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme |
| Thermal Conductivity | 2.4 W/mK-81% | 12.5 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 1.5g and 5g syringes | Sold in cuttable sheet sizes and thicknesses |
| Recommended Use | CPU/GPU General Cooling | High-end CPU/GPU |
| Reapplication Interval | Long shelf stability before application; no in-use interval published | Reusable; no reapplication needed unless physically damaged |
| Safety Notes | None | Cut to size with scissors; non-conductive |
| Applicator Included | Spatula | No |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Pad |
Price comparison
| Retailer | Akasa AK-455 | Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| Thermal Grizzly | View on Thermal Grizzly |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Akasa AK-455 vs SilverStone TF02
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Akasa AK-450 Silver Compound 450 vs Akasa AK-455
- Arctic MX-7 vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
- Alphacool Subzero vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme




