Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut Extreme: Comparison
Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK and Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut Extreme separate most on thermal conductivity: Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK at 11.0 W/mK, Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut Extreme at 73 W/mK, 85% in favour of Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut Extreme.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Alphacool | Thermal Grizzly |
| Model | Alphacool Eisschicht 11W/mK | Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut Extreme , Conductonaut Extreme |
| Thermal Conductivity | 11.0 W/mK-85% | 73 W/mK |
| Package Size | 95 x 32 x 0.5mm sheet, cuttable to size while the protective foil is left on | 1g syringe |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU; Alphacool also markets it for VRM, VRAM, and other board-level components | Delidded-Direct-Die (GPU and vertical mounting) |
| Pump-Out Resistance | High | High |
| Paste Segment | Pad | Liquid Metal |
| Spec Score | 7.7 | 4.9 |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Noctua NT-H1
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut Extreme
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Coollaboratory Liquid Extreme
- Alphacool Eisschicht Thermal Pad 11W/mK vs Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme