Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Alphacool Subzero vs Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80: Comparison

Alphacool Subzero and Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80 separate most on thermal conductivity: Alphacool Subzero at 16 W/mK, Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80 at 8.3 W/mK, 48% in favour of Alphacool Subzero.

Alphacool Subzero (High-Performance Silicone-Based/Non-Conductive/16 W/mK)
AlphacoolAlphacool Subzero
Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80 (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/8.3 W/mK)
ParkerParker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80

Specs

Specification
Alphacool Subzero (High-Performance Silicone-Based/Non-Conductive/16 W/mK)
Alphacool Subzero
Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80 (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/8.3 W/mK)
Parker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80
Compound TypeHigh-Performance Silicone-BasedSilicone-Based Pad
BrandAlphacoolParker Chomerics
ModelAlphacool Subzero , SubzeroTHERM-A-GAP PAD 80
Thermal Conductivity16 W/mK8.3 W/mK-48%
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package Size1g / 3.5g / 20g tubesSheet form, cut to size, multiple thicknesses
Recommended UseHigh-end CPU/GPU (including overclocking)High-end CPU/GPU and general electronics gap filling
Reapplication IntervalVerify manufacturer-rated intervalNo reapplication needed; reusable silicone gap filler
Safety NotesNoneNon-conductive silicone pad; no special handling precautions required
Paste SegmentStandard PastePad

Price comparison

RetailerAlphacool SubzeroParker Chomerics THERM-A-GAP PAD 80
DigiKeyView on DigiKey
Sealing Devices (Datasheet)View on Sealing Devices (Datasheet)

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste