Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs EVGA Frostbite 2: Comparison
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond and EVGA Frostbite 2 separate most on thermal conductivity: Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond at 11 W/mK, EVGA Frostbite 2 at 1.6 W/mK, 85% in favour of Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond. They match on electrical conductivity and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based (Nano-Diamond) | Manufacturer does not publish composition (pending verification) |
| Brand | Antec | EVGA |
| Model | Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond | EVGA Frostbite 2 (400-TG-TM01-BR) |
| Thermal Conductivity | 11 W/mK | 1.6 W/mK-85% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 4g syringe | 2.5g tube |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU (Air/Liquid Coolers) | Mainstream CPU/GPU |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Zalman ZM-STC10
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs StarTech.com StarTech SILV5-THERMAL-PASTE




