Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Gelid Solutions Gelid GC-Extreme: Comparison
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond and Gelid Solutions Gelid GC-Extreme separate most on thermal conductivity: Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond at 11 W/mK, Gelid Solutions Gelid GC-Extreme at 8.5 W/mK, 23% in favour of Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond. They match on electrical conductivity, safety notes and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based (Nano-Diamond) | Carbon-Based |
| Brand | Antec | Gelid Solutions |
| Model | Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond | Gelid GC-Extreme , GC-Extreme |
| Thermal Conductivity | 11 W/mK | 8.5 W/mK-23% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 4g syringe | 3.5g / 10g tubes |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU (Air/Liquid Coolers) | Mainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU |
| Reapplication Interval | Not consistently published | Verify manufacturer-rated interval |
| Safety Notes | None | None |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Gelid Solutions Gelid GC-Extreme
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Zalman ZM-STC10




