Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Gelid Solutions Gelid GP-Extreme Pad: Comparison
Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond and Gelid Solutions Gelid GP-Extreme Pad separate most on thermal conductivity: Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond at 11 W/mK, Gelid Solutions Gelid GP-Extreme Pad at 12 W/mK, 8% in favour of Gelid Solutions Gelid GP-Extreme Pad. They match on electrical conductivity and safety notes.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based (Nano-Diamond) | Silicone-Based Pad |
| Brand | Antec | Gelid Solutions |
| Model | Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond | Gelid GP-Extreme Pad , GP-Extreme Pad |
| Thermal Conductivity | 11 W/mK-8% | 12 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 4g syringe | 80x40mm sheets, 1.0mm/1.5mm thickness |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU (Air/Liquid Coolers) | Laptop-Thin-GPU (GPU VRAM/VRM and motherboard chipset gap-filling) |
| Reapplication Interval | Not consistently published | Long-term stable, not a wear item |
| Safety Notes | None | None |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Pad |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Extreme
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Gelid Solutions Gelid GP-Extreme Pad
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs ID-Cooling Frost X45
- Antec Formula 7 Nano Diamond vs StarTech.com StarTech SILV5-THERMAL-PASTE