Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Arctic MX-6 vs Arctic TP-4: Comparison

Arctic MX-6 and Arctic TP-4 differ on recommended use: Arctic MX-6 at Mainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU (mainstream to upper-mid builds), Arctic TP-4 at Mainstream CPU/GPU, Laptop-Thin-GPU (RAM, chipsets, GPUs, consoles, laptops).

Specs

Specification
Arctic MX-6 (Carbon-Based/8.5 W/mK/Non-Conductive/Best Overall Value/8+ Year Longevity)
Arctic MX-6
Arctic TP-4 (Silicone-Based Pad/Non-Conductive/Premium Performance, Stackable, SP6-Ready)
Arctic TP-4
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package Size2g / 4g / 8g / 20g tubes120x20mm or 100x100mm sheets, 0.5mm/1mm/1.5mm thickness, 1 or 4-pad packs
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU (mainstream to upper-mid builds)Mainstream CPU/GPU, Laptop-Thin-GPU (RAM, chipsets, GPUs, consoles, laptops)
Safety NotesNoneElectrically insulating (volume resistance 1.52x10^13 ohm-cm, breakdown voltage 8620 V/mil), non-adhesive, UL 94 V-0 flammability rated, dielectric constant 7.2 @1MHz
Paste SegmentStandard PastePad

Price comparison

RetailerArctic MX-6Arctic TP-4
Arctic StoreView on Arctic Store

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste