Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Arctic MX-6 vs Deepcool EK720-XL-2.0: Comparison

Arctic MX-6 and Deepcool EK720-XL-2.0 separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-6 at 8.5 W/mK, Deepcool EK720-XL-2.0 at 6.0 W/mK, 29% in favour of Arctic MX-6.

Specs

Specification
Arctic MX-6 (Carbon-Based/8.5 W/mK/Non-Conductive/Best Overall Value/8+ Year Longevity)
Arctic MX-6
Deepcool EK720-XL-2.0 (Thermal Pad/Non-Conductive/6.0 W/mK/Laptop-GPU Pad)
Deepcool EK720-XL-2.0
Thermal Conductivity8.5 W/mK6.0 W/mK-29%
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package Size2g / 4g / 8g / 20g tubes120 x 120 mm sheet, 2.0 mm thickness (also sold in 0.5/1.0/1.5mm thicknesses and L/XS sizes)
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU (mainstream to upper-mid builds)Laptop-Thin-GPU (marketed for laptops, graphics cards and game consoles)
Safety NotesNoneKeep away from small children and pets; not for internal consumption
Paste SegmentStandard PastePad

More comparisons in Thermal Paste