Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Arctic MX-6 vs EK-TIM Ectotherm: Comparison

Arctic MX-6 and EK-TIM Ectotherm differ on compound type: Arctic MX-6 at Carbon-Based, EK-TIM Ectotherm at Metal Oxide/Ceramic Hybrid. They match on 4 other specifications, including thermal conductivity, electrical conductivity and safety notes.

Arctic MX-6 (Carbon-Based/8.5 W/mK/Non-Conductive/Best Overall Value/8+ Year Longevity)
ArcticArctic MX-6
EK-TIM Ectotherm (Metal Oxide/Ceramic Hybrid/Non-Conductive/Low-Viscosity Water Block Formula)
EK-TIMEK-TIM Ectotherm

Specs

Specification
Arctic MX-6 (Carbon-Based/8.5 W/mK/Non-Conductive/Best Overall Value/8+ Year Longevity)
Arctic MX-6
EK-TIM Ectotherm (Metal Oxide/Ceramic Hybrid/Non-Conductive/Low-Viscosity Water Block Formula)
EK-TIM Ectotherm
Compound TypeCarbon-BasedMetal Oxide/Ceramic Hybrid
BrandArcticEKWB
ModelArctic MX-6 , MX-6EK-TIM Ectotherm
Thermal Conductivity8.5 W/mK8.5 W/mK
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package Size2g / 4g / 8g / 20g tubes1g and 5g syringes
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU (mainstream to upper-mid builds)Custom Loop/AIO Builders, GPU Water Blocks
Reapplication Interval8+ yearsNot consistently published
Safety NotesNoneNone
Paste SegmentStandard PasteStandard Paste

More comparisons in Thermal Paste