Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Arctic MX-6 vs Gelid Solutions Gelid GC-4 Extreme Thermal Paste: Comparison

Arctic MX-6 and Gelid Solutions Gelid GC-4 Extreme Thermal Paste differ on package size: Arctic MX-6 at 2g / 4g / 8g / 20g tubes, Gelid Solutions Gelid GC-4 Extreme Thermal Paste at 1g, 3.5g, and 10g tubes. They match on 4 other specifications, including electrical conductivity, pump-out resistance and curing.

Arctic MX-6 (Carbon-Based/8.5 W/mK/Non-Conductive/Best Overall Value/8+ Year Longevity)
ArcticArctic MX-6
Gelid GC-4 Extreme Thermal Paste (Synthetic/Non-Conductive/Wide-Temp-Range Compound)
GelidGelid Solutions Gelid GC-4 Extreme Thermal Paste

Specs

Specification
Arctic MX-6 (Carbon-Based/8.5 W/mK/Non-Conductive/Best Overall Value/8+ Year Longevity)
Arctic MX-6
Gelid GC-4 Extreme Thermal Paste (Synthetic/Non-Conductive/Wide-Temp-Range Compound)
Gelid Solutions Gelid GC-4 Extreme Thermal Paste
BrandArcticGelid Solutions
ModelArctic MX-6 , MX-6GC-4, TC-GC-04-A (1g), TC-GC-04-B (3.5g), TC-GC-04-C (10g)
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package Size2g / 4g / 8g / 20g tubes1g, 3.5g, and 10g tubes
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU (mainstream to upper-mid builds)Marketed by Gelid for professional and extreme users
Safety NotesNoneNon-curing formula, marketed as "No Bleeding"
Pump-Out ResistanceHighHigh
CuringNon-CuringNon-Curing
Paste SegmentStandard PasteStandard Paste

More comparisons in Thermal Paste