Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-6 vs Gelid Solutions Gelid GC-Extreme: Comparison
Arctic MX-6 and Gelid Solutions Gelid GC-Extreme differ on package size: Arctic MX-6 at 2g / 4g / 8g / 20g tubes, Gelid Solutions Gelid GC-Extreme at 3.5g / 10g tubes. They match on 5 other specifications, including compound type, thermal conductivity and electrical conductivity.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based | Carbon-Based |
| Brand | Arctic | Gelid Solutions |
| Model | Arctic MX-6 , MX-6 | Gelid GC-Extreme , GC-Extreme |
| Thermal Conductivity | 8.5 W/mK | 8.5 W/mK |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 2g / 4g / 8g / 20g tubes | 3.5g / 10g tubes |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU (mainstream to upper-mid builds) | Mainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU |
| Reapplication Interval | 8+ years | Verify manufacturer-rated interval |
| Safety Notes | None | None |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Arctic MX-6
- Arctic MX-6 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- 3M Thermally Conductive Acrylic Interface Pad 5590H vs Gelid Solutions Gelid GC-Extreme
- Arctic MX-6 vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Pro
- Arctic MX-6 vs SilverStone TF02
- Arctic MX-6 vs Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK