Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Arctic MX-6 vs Gelid Solutions Gelid GC-Pro: Comparison

Arctic MX-6 and Gelid Solutions Gelid GC-Pro separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-6 at 8.5 W/mK, Gelid Solutions Gelid GC-Pro at 7 W/mK, 18% in favour of Arctic MX-6. They match on electrical conductivity, curing and paste segment.

Arctic MX-6 (Carbon-Based/8.5 W/mK/Non-Conductive/Best Overall Value/8+ Year Longevity)
ArcticArctic MX-6
Gelid GC-Pro (Non-Conductive/7 W/mK/Discontinued Direct-Sale Compound)
GelidGelid Solutions Gelid GC-Pro

Specs

Specification
Arctic MX-6 (Carbon-Based/8.5 W/mK/Non-Conductive/Best Overall Value/8+ Year Longevity)
Arctic MX-6
Gelid GC-Pro (Non-Conductive/7 W/mK/Discontinued Direct-Sale Compound)
Gelid Solutions Gelid GC-Pro
BrandArcticGelid Solutions
ModelArctic MX-6 , MX-6GC-Pro
Thermal Conductivity8.5 W/mK7 W/mK-18%
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package Size2g / 4g / 8g / 20g tubes1g and 5g tubes
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU (mainstream to upper-mid builds)CPU, VGA, and chipset heatsink applications
Safety NotesNoneNon-flammable, non-toxic per manufacturer
CuringNon-CuringNon-Curing
Paste SegmentStandard PasteStandard Paste

More comparisons in Thermal Paste