Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Arctic MX-6 vs PCCooler A1: Comparison
Arctic MX-6 and PCCooler A1 separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-6 at 8.5 W/mK, PCCooler A1 at 7.5 W/mK, 12% in favour of Arctic MX-6. They match on electrical conductivity and paste segment.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Compound Type | Carbon-Based | Silver-infused compound (classification pending verification) |
| Brand | Arctic | PCCooler |
| Model | Arctic MX-6 , MX-6 | PCCooler A1 |
| Thermal Conductivity | 8.5 W/mK | 7.5 W/mK-12% |
| Electrical Conductivity | Insulating | Insulating |
| Package Size | 2g / 4g / 8g / 20g tubes | 2g syringe |
| Recommended Use | Mainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU (mainstream to upper-mid builds) | Mainstream CPU/GPU |
| Paste Segment | Standard Paste | Standard Paste |
More comparisons in Thermal Paste
- Alphacool Apex Thermal Pad Soft 18W/mK vs Arctic MX-6
- Arctic MX-6 vs Phobya Thermal Pad Ultra 5W/mK
- Arctic MX-6 vs Thermal Grizzly Minus Pad Pro
- Arctic MX-6 vs Phobya Thermal Pad XT 7W/mK
- Arctic MX-6 vs Wakefield Thermal (Wakefield-Vette) Wakefield Solutions PL-1-3-1016-H Thermal Pad
- Arctic MX-6 vs SilverStone TF02