Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Arctic MX-6 vs Thermaltake TG-30: Comparison

Arctic MX-6 and Thermaltake TG-30 separate most on thermal conductivity: Arctic MX-6 at 8.5 W/mK, Thermaltake TG-30 at 4.5 W/mK, 47% in favour of Arctic MX-6. They match on 4 other specifications, including electrical conductivity, pump-out resistance and curing.

Arctic MX-6 (Carbon-Based/8.5 W/mK/Non-Conductive/Best Overall Value/8+ Year Longevity)
ArcticArctic MX-6
Thermaltake TG-30 (Diamond-Based/Non-Conductive/4.5 W/mK/Syringe Applicator Kit)
ThermaltakeThermaltake TG-30

Specs

Specification
Arctic MX-6 (Carbon-Based/8.5 W/mK/Non-Conductive/Best Overall Value/8+ Year Longevity)
Arctic MX-6
Thermaltake TG-30 (Diamond-Based/Non-Conductive/4.5 W/mK/Syringe Applicator Kit)
Thermaltake TG-30
Thermal Conductivity8.5 W/mK4.5 W/mK-47%
Electrical ConductivityInsulatingInsulating
Package Size2g / 4g / 8g / 20g tubes4.0g syringe
Recommended UseMainstream CPU/GPU, High-end CPU/GPU (mainstream to upper-mid builds)Mainstream CPU/GPU
Safety NotesNoneNon-electrically conductive
Pump-Out ResistanceHighHigh
CuringNon-CuringNon-Curing
Paste SegmentStandard PasteStandard Paste
Spec Score6.86.2

Price comparison

RetailerArctic MX-6Thermaltake TG-30
NeweggView on Newegg

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

More comparisons in Thermal Paste