Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Cooler Master MM731 vs Pulsar X2H Mini: Comparison
Cooler Master MM731 vs Pulsar X2H Mini: the sensor model difference
They are built to different briefs, and sensor model shows it, Cooler Master MM731 PixArt PAW3370, up to 19,000 DPI against Pulsar X2H Mini PAW3395, up to 26,000 DPI. On weight there is little in it, 49 g on the Cooler Master MM731 versus 52 g on the Pulsar X2H Mini. Connectivity is not the same on both, Wireless , Bluetooth on the Cooler Master MM731 versus Wireless , Wired on the Pulsar X2H Mini. They differ on polling rate too, 1000 Hz on the Cooler Master MM731 versus 1000Hz on the Pulsar X2H Mini. There is a split on shape as well, Symmetrical, honeycomb on the Cooler Master MM731 versus Symmetrical, Compact Shell on the Pulsar X2H Mini.
Cooler Master MM731 vs Pulsar X2H Mini: which one fits your build
Buy the Cooler Master MM731 for budget shoppers chasing sub-50g wireless weight and ambidextrous claw and fingertip grip users, though it is the wrong buy for buyers who dislike honeycomb/vented shells and palm grip users wanting a fuller shell. Take the Pulsar X2H Mini for players with smaller hands who want the Pulsar X2's sensor and switch quality in a more compact shell. This mouse directly addresses that sizing need. It is not the one for players with larger hands who prefer the standard X2 size. The standard Pulsar X2, covered elsewhere on this site, offers that larger shell. Our rating of the Cooler Master MM731 (8/10): one of the best value-for-weight wireless mice available; it just lacks the sensor polish of pricier flagships.
Where the two are identical
Where they agree, they agree completely, grip type and switch type included, so the decision does not turn on any of those.
Specs and benchmarks
Brand
- Cooler Master MM731
- Cooler Master
- Pulsar X2H Mini
- Pulsar
Connectivity
- Cooler Master MM731
- Wireless (2.4GHz), Bluetooth
- Pulsar X2H Mini
- Wireless (2.4GHz), Wired
Grip Type
- Cooler Master MM731
- Ambidextrous
- Pulsar X2H Mini
- Ambidextrous
Model
- Cooler Master MM731
- MM731
- Pulsar X2H Mini
- X2H Mini
Shape
- Cooler Master MM731
- Symmetrical, honeycomb
- Pulsar X2H Mini
- Symmetrical, Compact Shell
Sensor Model
- Cooler Master MM731
- PixArt PAW3370, up to 19,000 DPI
- Pulsar X2H Mini
- PAW3395, up to 26,000 DPI
Polling Rate
- Cooler Master MM731
- 1000 Hz
- Pulsar X2H Mini
- 1000Hz (Up to 4000Hz with Dongle)
Weight
- Cooler Master MM731
- 49 gBest
- Pulsar X2H Mini
- 52 g-6%
Battery Life
- Cooler Master MM731
- Up to 70 hours
- Pulsar X2H Mini
- Up to 70 Hours
Switch Type
- Cooler Master MM731
- Optical
- Pulsar X2H Mini
- Optical
Which one should you pick?
Choose Cooler Master MM731 if you want the lower weight (49 g vs 52 g).
Choose Pulsar X2H Mini if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.
Price comparison
| Retailer | Cooler Master MM731 | Pulsar X2H Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
Verdict
Cooler Master MM731
8 / 10 Expert Rating
One of the best value-for-weight wireless mice available; it just lacks the sensor polish of pricier flagships.