Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Corsair Katar Pro XT vs HyperX Pulsefire Dart: Comparison

Corsair Katar Pro XT vs HyperX Pulsefire Dart weight compared

Weight is where these two genuinely part company, Corsair Katar Pro XT 96 g against HyperX Pulsefire Dart 141 g, a 47% lead for Corsair Katar Pro XT. HyperX Pulsefire Dart also leads on buttons, 6 on the Corsair Katar Pro XT versus 7 on the HyperX Pulsefire Dart. Grip type is not the same on both, Ambidextrous on the Corsair Katar Pro XT versus Right-Handed on the HyperX Pulsefire Dart. Shape is not the same on both, Symmetrical on the Corsair Katar Pro XT versus Ergonomic on the HyperX Pulsefire Dart. There is a split on switch type as well, Omron, rated 50 million clicks on the Corsair Katar Pro XT versus Omron on the HyperX Pulsefire Dart.

Corsair Katar Pro XT vs HyperX Pulsefire Dart: which one fits your build

The Corsair Katar Pro XT suits budget-conscious esports players and ambidextrous claw or fingertip grip users, though it is the wrong buy for buyers who want wireless freedom and palm grip users wanting an ergonomic shape. The HyperX Pulsefire Dart is the one to take for right-handed palm grip players wanting Qi charging and long gaming session comfort seekers, though it is not the pick for players chasing sub-80g weight and left-handed users. Our rating of the Corsair Katar Pro XT (7/10): solid value wired mouse that covers the fundamentals without any standout feature. Our rating of the HyperX Pulsefire Dart (6/10): showing its age against modern ultralight wireless mice, but Qi charging and ergonomic comfort still have an audience.

Frequently asked questions

Do the Corsair Katar Pro XT and HyperX Pulsefire Dart differ on sensor model?

Yes. Sensor Model reads PixArt PMW3391 Optical, up to 18,000 DPI on the Corsair Katar Pro XT versus PixArt PMW3389 Optical, up to 16,000 DPI on the HyperX Pulsefire Dart.

Is the Polling Rate the same on the Corsair Katar Pro XT and HyperX Pulsefire Dart?

It is. Both are listed at 1000 Hz, so it is not a reason to pick one over the other.

Specs and benchmarks

  • Brand

    Corsair Katar Pro XT
    Corsair
    HyperX Pulsefire Dart
    HyperX
  • Connectivity

    Corsair Katar Pro XT
    Wired
    HyperX Pulsefire Dart
    Wireless (2.4GHz)
  • Grip Type

    Corsair Katar Pro XT
    Ambidextrous
    HyperX Pulsefire Dart
    Right-Handed
  • Model

    Corsair Katar Pro XT
    Katar Pro XT
    HyperX Pulsefire Dart
    Pulsefire Dart
  • Shape

    Corsair Katar Pro XT
    Symmetrical
    HyperX Pulsefire Dart
    Ergonomic
  • Sensor Model

    Corsair Katar Pro XT
    PixArt PMW3391 Optical, up to 18,000 DPI
    HyperX Pulsefire Dart
    PixArt PMW3389 Optical, up to 16,000 DPI
  • Sensor Tier

    Corsair Katar Pro XT
    Entry-Mid
    HyperX Pulsefire Dart
    Mid-High
  • Buttons

    Corsair Katar Pro XT
    6-14%
    HyperX Pulsefire Dart
    7Best
  • Polling Rate

    Corsair Katar Pro XT
    1000 Hz
    HyperX Pulsefire Dart
    1000 Hz
  • Weight

    Corsair Katar Pro XT
    96 gBest
    HyperX Pulsefire Dart
    141 g-47%
  • Switch Type

    Corsair Katar Pro XT
    Omron, rated 50 million clicks
    HyperX Pulsefire Dart
    Omron

    Which one should you pick?

    Choose Corsair Katar Pro XT if you want the higher polling rate (1000 Hz vs 1000 Hz) and the lower weight (96 g vs 141 g).

    Choose HyperX Pulsefire Dart if you want the higher buttons (7 vs 6).

    Price comparison

    RetailerCorsair Katar Pro XTHyperX Pulsefire Dart
    AmazonView on AmazonView on Amazon
    NeweggView on Newegg

    Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

    Verdict

    Corsair Katar Pro XT

    7 / 10 Expert Rating

    Solid value wired mouse that covers the fundamentals without any standout feature.

    HyperX Pulsefire Dart

    6 / 10 Expert Rating

    Showing its age against modern ultralight wireless mice, but Qi charging and ergonomic comfort still have an audience.