Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Endgame Gear XM2we vs Razer DeathAdder V3 HyperSpeed: Comparison
Endgame Gear XM2we and Razer DeathAdder V3 HyperSpeed separate most on polling rate: Endgame Gear XM2we at 1000 Hz, Razer DeathAdder V3 HyperSpeed at 8000 Hz, 88% in favour of Razer DeathAdder V3 HyperSpeed. Weight splits them by another 5%, again favouring Razer DeathAdder V3 HyperSpeed.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Endgame Gear | Razer |
| Connectivity | Wireless (2.4GHz) | Wireless |
| Grip Type | Ambidextrous | Ergonomic |
| Model | XM2we | Razer DeathAdder V3 HyperSpeed |
| Shape | Symmetrical | Right-hand specific |
| Sensor Tier | High | Mid |
| Polling Rate | 1000 Hz-87% | 8000 Hz |
| Weight | 66-5% | 63 |
| Sensor | PixArt PAW3370, up to 19,000 DPI | Focus Pro 36K, up to 36,000 DPI |
| Switches | Kailh GM 8.0 | Optical |
Verdict
Endgame Gear XM2we
8 / 10 Expert Rating
A comfortable, no-frills wireless upgrade for fans of Endgame Gear's XM shape.
Razer DeathAdder V3 HyperSpeed
9 / 10 Expert Rating
A smart value pick — flagship-tier sensor and shape performance in a lightweight ergonomic wireless package, skipping only the features most competitive players don't need.