Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Glorious Model O 2 Pro vs Pwnage Ultra Custom: Comparison

What is the difference between Glorious Model O 2 Pro and Pwnage Ultra Custom?

They are built to different briefs, and sensor model shows it, Glorious Model O 2 Pro BAMF 2.0, up to 32,000 DPI against Pwnage Ultra Custom PixArt PAW3395. Glorious Model O 2 Pro also leads on buttons, 6 on the Glorious Model O 2 Pro versus 5 on the Pwnage Ultra Custom. They differ on shape too, Symmetrical, honeycomb on the Glorious Model O 2 Pro versus Symmetrical on the Pwnage Ultra Custom. Switch type is not the same on both, Glorious Optical Gen-2 on the Glorious Model O 2 Pro versus Magnetic on the Pwnage Ultra Custom.

Which should you buy, Glorious Model O 2 Pro or Pwnage Ultra Custom?

The Glorious Model O 2 Pro suits fans of honeycomb/vented shells and competitive players wanting 8000Hz wireless polling, though it is the wrong buy for anyone who dislikes cutout/honeycomb shells collecting dust and palm grip users wanting a fully enclosed shell. The Pwnage Ultra Custom is the one to take for enthusiasts who want a customizable, modular shell shape and competitive players wanting magnetic switches and 4000Hz polling, though it is not the pick for budget buyers, since boutique pricing applies and anyone who wants RGB lighting. Our rating of the Glorious Model O 2 Pro (9/10): Glorious's most complete flagship yet, the honeycomb shell finally comes with sensor and polling specs to match. Our rating of the Pwnage Ultra Custom (8/10): A niche but genuinely impressive modular mouse for enthusiasts who want to fine-tune shape and weight beyond what any factory shell offers.

Frequently asked questions

Do the Glorious Model O 2 Pro and Pwnage Ultra Custom differ on connectivity?

Yes. Connectivity reads Wireless on the Glorious Model O 2 Pro versus Wireless 2.4G on the Pwnage Ultra Custom.

Is the Sensor Tier the same on the Glorious Model O 2 Pro and Pwnage Ultra Custom?

It is. Both are listed at Flagship, so it is not a reason to pick one over the other.

Specs and benchmarks

  • Brand

    Glorious Model O 2 Pro
    Glorious
    Pwnage Ultra Custom
    Pwnage
  • Connectivity

    Glorious Model O 2 Pro
    Wireless (2.4GHz)
    Pwnage Ultra Custom
    Wireless 2.4G
  • Grip Type

    Glorious Model O 2 Pro
    Ambidextrous
    Pwnage Ultra Custom
    Ambidextrous
  • Model

    Glorious Model O 2 Pro
    Model O 2 Pro
    Pwnage Ultra Custom
    Ultra Custom
  • Shape

    Glorious Model O 2 Pro
    Symmetrical, honeycomb
    Pwnage Ultra Custom
    Symmetrical
  • Sensor Model

    Glorious Model O 2 Pro
    BAMF 2.0, up to 32,000 DPI
    Pwnage Ultra Custom
    PixArt PAW3395
  • Sensor Tier

    Glorious Model O 2 Pro
    Flagship
    Pwnage Ultra Custom
    Flagship
  • Buttons

    Glorious Model O 2 Pro
    6Best
    Pwnage Ultra Custom
    5-17%
  • Polling Rate

    Glorious Model O 2 Pro
    Up to 8000HzBest
    Pwnage Ultra Custom
    4000 Hz
  • Weight

    Glorious Model O 2 Pro
    55 g-8%
    Pwnage Ultra Custom
    51 gBest
  • Switch Type

    Glorious Model O 2 Pro
    Glorious Optical Gen-2
    Pwnage Ultra Custom
    Magnetic

    Which one should you pick?

    Choose Glorious Model O 2 Pro if you want the higher buttons (6 vs 5) and the higher polling rate (Up to 8000Hz vs 4000 Hz).

    Choose Pwnage Ultra Custom if you want the lower weight (51 g vs 55 g).

    Price comparison

    RetailerGlorious Model O 2 ProPwnage Ultra Custom
    AmazonView on Amazon

    Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

    Verdict

    Glorious Model O 2 Pro

    9 / 10 Expert Rating

    Glorious's most complete flagship yet, the honeycomb shell finally comes with sensor and polling specs to match.

    Pwnage Ultra Custom

    8 / 10 Expert Rating

    A niche but genuinely impressive modular mouse for enthusiasts who want to fine-tune shape and weight beyond what any factory shell offers.

    More comparisons in Gaming Mice