Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Intel Acer Predator BiFrost OC Arc A770 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64: Comparison
Intel Acer Predator BiFrost OC Arc A770 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 vram compared
On vram the spread is 50%, Intel Acer Predator BiFrost OC Arc A770 16 GB against AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 8 GB, so Intel Acer Predator BiFrost OC Arc A770 takes it. Intel Acer Predator BiFrost OC Arc A770 also leads on boost clock, 2200 MHz on the Intel Acer Predator BiFrost OC Arc A770 versus 1546 MHz on the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64. Add tdp to that, 225 W on the Intel Acer Predator BiFrost OC Arc A770 versus 295 W on the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, and the pattern holds.
Who each one is for
Buy the Intel Acer Predator BiFrost OC Arc A770 for gamers targeting the resolution this mainstream tier is built for, though it is not the pick for 4K/high-refresh gamers if this card's tier sits below High-End. It also earns its place with builders who want 16GB of VRAM without moving up a tier. It is not the one for buyers who need the absolute best price-to-performance and should compare street prices first. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 is the one to take for secondhand budget builds where power cost isn't a big concern and retro AMD builds from the Vega era, though it is the wrong buy for anyone wanting ray tracing. It is the wrong buy for power-conscious builds - 295W for 1080-class performance is inefficient by any modern standard.
Which is cheaper, Intel Acer Predator BiFrost OC Arc A770 or AMD Radeon RX Vega 64?
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 asks 43% more, $499 against $349 for the Intel Acer Predator BiFrost OC Arc A770.
Frequently asked questions
Do the Intel Acer Predator BiFrost OC Arc A770 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 differ on card length?
Yes. Card Length reads 280 mm on the Intel Acer Predator BiFrost OC Arc A770 versus 267 mm on the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64.
Specs and benchmarks
GPU Brand
- Intel Acer Predator BiFrost OC Arc A770
- Intel
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- AMD
Series
- Intel Acer Predator BiFrost OC Arc A770
- Arc Alchemist
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- Radeon RX Vega
Board Partner
- Intel Acer Predator BiFrost OC Arc A770
- Acer
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- AMD Reference
VRAM
- Intel Acer Predator BiFrost OC Arc A770
- 16 GBBest
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- 8 GB-50%
Tier
- Intel Acer Predator BiFrost OC Arc A770
- Mainstream
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- Flagship (2017, legacy)
Memory Type
- Intel Acer Predator BiFrost OC Arc A770
- GDDR6Best
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- HBM2
Boost Clock
- Intel Acer Predator BiFrost OC Arc A770
- 2200 MHzBest
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- 1546 MHz-30%
Ray Tracing Support
- Intel Acer Predator BiFrost OC Arc A770
- Yes
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- No
TDP
- Intel Acer Predator BiFrost OC Arc A770
- 225 WBest
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- 295 W-31%
Architecture
- Intel Acer Predator BiFrost OC Arc A770
- Xe-HPG Alchemist (ACM-G10)
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- Vega (GCN 5)
Card Length
- Intel Acer Predator BiFrost OC Arc A770
- 280 mm-5%
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- 267 mmBest
Slot Width
- Intel Acer Predator BiFrost OC Arc A770
- 2.5-25%
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- 2Best
MSRP
- Intel Acer Predator BiFrost OC Arc A770
- $349
- AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- $499
Which one should you pick?
Choose Intel Acer Predator BiFrost OC Arc A770 if you want the higher VRAM (16 GB vs 8 GB), the higher boost clock (2200 MHz vs 1546 MHz) and the lower TDP (225 W vs 295 W).
Choose AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 if you want the lower card length (267 mm vs 280 mm) and the lower slot width (2 vs 2.5).
Price comparison
| Retailer | Intel Acer Predator BiFrost OC Arc A770 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Newegg | $349.00 View on Newegg | |
| Consumercarts listing | $499.00 View on Consumercarts listing |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
Verdict
Intel Acer Predator BiFrost OC Arc A770
7 / 10 Expert Rating
A solid mainstream pick if its price and 16GB VRAM allocation match your target resolution.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
4.7 / 10 Expert Rating
Ambitious but inefficient even at launch - a legacy budget card today, mostly notable now for its HBM2 memory and mining-era history.