Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Acer Nitro VG272U vs ViewSonic VG1655: Comparison
Acer Nitro VG272U vs ViewSonic VG1655: the refresh rate difference
Refresh rate is where these two genuinely part company, Acer Nitro VG272U 180 Hz against ViewSonic VG1655 60 Hz, a 67% lead for Acer Nitro VG272U. Add screen size to that, 27 in on the Acer Nitro VG272U versus 15.6 in on the ViewSonic VG1655, and the pattern holds. Resolution is not the same on both, 2560 x 1440 on the Acer Nitro VG272U versus 1920 x 1080 on the ViewSonic VG1655. Response time is closer, 1ms on the Acer Nitro VG272U versus 6.5 ms on the ViewSonic VG1655. Adaptive sync is not the same on both, AMD FreeSync Premium on the Acer Nitro VG272U versus None on the ViewSonic VG1655.
Who each one is for
The Acer Nitro VG272U suits budget-conscious gamers wanting high refresh QHD and first upgrade from 1080p/60Hz displays, though it is not built for buyers wanting full stand ergonomics and HDR content viewers. The ViewSonic VG1655 is the one to take for IT teams standardizing portable monitors across a hybrid workforce and home desk users wanting VESA monitor arm compatibility, though it is the wrong buy for users who want touchscreen input and gamers or high refresh rate seekers. Our rating of the Acer Nitro VG272U (7.5/10): A genuinely fast budget QHD gaming monitor that sacrifices ergonomics and HDR to hit an aggressive price point. Our rating of the ViewSonic VG1655 (7.2/10): A dependable, VESA-friendly business portable monitor, best suited to fleet purchases and hybrid desk setups.
What Acer Nitro VG272U and ViewSonic VG1655 have in common
The common ground is wider than the gap: panel type and aspect ratio are identical here.
Specs and benchmarks
Panel Type
- Acer Nitro VG272U
- IPS
- ViewSonic VG1655
- IPS
Brand
- Acer Nitro VG272U
- Acer
- ViewSonic VG1655
- ViewSonic
Model Number
- Acer Nitro VG272U
- VG272U Mbmiipx
- ViewSonic VG1655
- VG1655
Screen Size
- Acer Nitro VG272U
- 27 inBest
- ViewSonic VG1655
- 15.6 in-42%
Resolution
- Acer Nitro VG272U
- 2560 x 1440 (QHD)
- ViewSonic VG1655
- 1920 x 1080 (Full HD)
Aspect Ratio
- Acer Nitro VG272U
- 16:9
- ViewSonic VG1655
- 16:9
Refresh Rate
- Acer Nitro VG272U
- 180 HzBest
- ViewSonic VG1655
- 60 Hz-67%
Response Time
- Acer Nitro VG272U
- 1ms (VRB)Best
- ViewSonic VG1655
- 6.5 ms
Adaptive Sync
- Acer Nitro VG272U
- AMD FreeSync Premium
- ViewSonic VG1655
- None
Series
- Acer Nitro VG272U
- Nitro VG272U
- ViewSonic VG1655
- VG1655
Which one should you pick?
Choose Acer Nitro VG272U if you want the higher screen size (27 in vs 15.6 in), the higher refresh rate (180 Hz vs 60 Hz) and the lower response time (1ms (VRB) vs 6.5 ms).
Choose ViewSonic VG1655 if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.
Price comparison
| Retailer | Acer Nitro VG272U | ViewSonic VG1655 |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon | View on Amazon |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
Verdict
Acer Nitro VG272U
7.5 / 10 Expert Rating
A genuinely fast budget QHD gaming monitor that sacrifices ergonomics and HDR to hit an aggressive price point.
ViewSonic VG1655
7.2 / 10 Expert Rating
A dependable, VESA-friendly business portable monitor, best suited to fleet purchases and hybrid desk setups.