Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
Acer Nitro XV320QU vs ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP: Comparison
Acer Nitro XV320QU vs ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP: the refresh rate difference
Refresh rate is where these two genuinely part company, Acer Nitro XV320QU 170 Hz against ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP 240 Hz, a 29% lead for ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP. Screen size runs the same way, 32 in on the Acer Nitro XV320QU versus 27 in on the ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP, another win for Acer Nitro XV320QU.
Who each one is for
Buy the Acer Nitro XV320QU for Dual-PC users wanting a built-in KVM switch and casual to mid-level gamers upgrading from 1080p, though it is not built for pixel-density purists wanting maximum sharpness at 1440p and competitive players wanting sub-1ms OLED-class response. The same goes for buyers wanting a larger 1440p canvas without a 4K price tag. The ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP suits competitive esports players wanting near-instant pixel response and gamers with mid-range GPUs who can't sustain 4K/240Hz, though it is the wrong buy for productivity users who want maximum screen real estate at 4K and static-content users worried about long-term OLED burn-in risk. It also earns its place with anyone upgrading from an LCD who wants OLED contrast without 4K's GPU tax. Our rating of the Acer Nitro XV320QU (7.8/10): A practical, larger-format value gaming monitor whose built-in KVM switch adds real convenience for dual-PC users. Our rating of the ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP (8.8/10): an excellent, easier-to-drive alternative to 4K OLED gaming monitors for players who prioritize frame rate over resolution.
Frequently asked questions
Do the Acer Nitro XV320QU and ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP differ on panel type?
Yes. Panel Type reads IPS on the Acer Nitro XV320QU versus QD-OLED on the ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP.
Is the Aspect Ratio the same on the Acer Nitro XV320QU and ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP?
It is. Both are listed at 16:9, so it is not a reason to pick one over the other.
Specs and benchmarks
Panel Type
- Acer Nitro XV320QU
- IPS
- ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP
- QD-OLED
Brand
- Acer Nitro XV320QU
- Acer
- ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP
- ASUS
Model Number
- Acer Nitro XV320QU
- XV320QU
- ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP
- PG27AQDP
Screen Size
- Acer Nitro XV320QU
- 32 inBest
- ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP
- 27 in-16%
Resolution
- Acer Nitro XV320QU
- 2560 x 1440 (QHD)
- ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP
- 2560 x 1440 (QHD)
Aspect Ratio
- Acer Nitro XV320QU
- 16:9
- ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP
- 16:9
Refresh Rate
- Acer Nitro XV320QU
- 170 Hz-29%
- ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP
- 240 HzBest
Response Time
- Acer Nitro XV320QU
- 1ms (VRB)
- ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP
- 0.03ms (GtG)Best
Adaptive Sync
- Acer Nitro XV320QU
- AMD FreeSync Premium, G-Sync Compatible
- ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP
- NVIDIA G-Sync, AMD FreeSync Premium Pro
Series
- Acer Nitro XV320QU
- Nitro
- ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP
- ROG Swift
Color Gamut
- Acer Nitro XV320QU
- ~95%+ DCI-P3
- ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP
- ~99% DCI-P3
HDR Formats
- Acer Nitro XV320QU
- HDR10
- ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP
- VESA DisplayHDR True Black 400
Ports
- Acer Nitro XV320QU
- DisplayPort 1.4, 2x HDMI 2.0, built-in KVM switch
- ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP
- DisplayPort 2.1 UHBR10, 2x HDMI 2.1, USB hub
Which one should you pick?
Choose Acer Nitro XV320QU if you want the higher screen size (32 in vs 27 in).
Choose ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP if you want the higher refresh rate (240 Hz vs 170 Hz) and the lower response time (0.03ms (GtG) vs 1ms (VRB)).
Price comparison
| Retailer | Acer Nitro XV320QU | ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon | |
| Best Buy | View on Best Buy |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.
Verdict
Acer Nitro XV320QU
7.8 / 10 Expert Rating
A practical, larger-format value gaming monitor whose built-in KVM switch adds real convenience for dual-PC users.
ASUS ROG Swift PG27AQDP
8.8 / 10 Expert Rating
An excellent, easier-to-drive alternative to 4K OLED gaming monitors for players who prioritize frame rate over resolution.