Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Acer Nitro XV320QU vs ViewSonic VG1655: Comparison

Acer Nitro XV320QU vs ViewSonic VG1655 refresh rate compared

Start with refresh rate, because it is the widest measured gap between them: Acer Nitro XV320QU 170 Hz against ViewSonic VG1655 60 Hz, 65% in favour of Acer Nitro XV320QU. Screen size runs the same way, 32 in on the Acer Nitro XV320QU versus 15.6 in on the ViewSonic VG1655, another win for Acer Nitro XV320QU. There is a split on resolution as well, 2560 x 1440 on the Acer Nitro XV320QU versus 1920 x 1080 on the ViewSonic VG1655. The response time figures are near enough to ignore, 1ms on the Acer Nitro XV320QU versus 6.5 ms on the ViewSonic VG1655. Adaptive sync is not the same on both, AMD FreeSync Premium, G-Sync Compatible on the Acer Nitro XV320QU versus None on the ViewSonic VG1655.

Acer Nitro XV320QU vs ViewSonic VG1655: which one fits your build

Buy the Acer Nitro XV320QU for Dual-PC users wanting a built-in KVM switch and casual to mid-level gamers upgrading from 1080p, though it is the wrong buy for pixel-density purists wanting maximum sharpness at 1440p and competitive players wanting sub-1ms OLED-class response. It also earns its place with buyers wanting a larger 1440p canvas without a 4K price tag. The ViewSonic VG1655 suits IT teams standardizing portable monitors across a hybrid workforce and home desk users wanting VESA monitor arm compatibility, though it is not the pick for users who want touchscreen input and gamers or high refresh rate seekers. Our rating of the Acer Nitro XV320QU (7.8/10): A practical, larger-format value gaming monitor whose built-in KVM switch adds real convenience for dual-PC users. Our rating of the ViewSonic VG1655 (7.2/10): A dependable, VESA-friendly business portable monitor, best suited to fleet purchases and hybrid desk setups.

What Acer Nitro XV320QU and ViewSonic VG1655 have in common

Everything else lines up. Panel type and aspect ratio read the same on both, so those are not worth weighing.

Specs and benchmarks

  • Panel Type

    Acer Nitro XV320QU
    IPS
    ViewSonic VG1655
    IPS
  • Brand

    Acer Nitro XV320QU
    Acer
    ViewSonic VG1655
    ViewSonic
  • Model Number

    Acer Nitro XV320QU
    XV320QU
    ViewSonic VG1655
    VG1655
  • Screen Size

    Acer Nitro XV320QU
    32 inBest
    ViewSonic VG1655
    15.6 in-51%
  • Resolution

    Acer Nitro XV320QU
    2560 x 1440 (QHD)
    ViewSonic VG1655
    1920 x 1080 (Full HD)
  • Aspect Ratio

    Acer Nitro XV320QU
    16:9
    ViewSonic VG1655
    16:9
  • Refresh Rate

    Acer Nitro XV320QU
    170 HzBest
    ViewSonic VG1655
    60 Hz-65%
  • Response Time

    Acer Nitro XV320QU
    1ms (VRB)Best
    ViewSonic VG1655
    6.5 ms
  • Adaptive Sync

    Acer Nitro XV320QU
    AMD FreeSync Premium, G-Sync Compatible
    ViewSonic VG1655
    None
  • Series

    Acer Nitro XV320QU
    Nitro
    ViewSonic VG1655
    VG1655

    Which one should you pick?

    Choose Acer Nitro XV320QU if you want the higher screen size (32 in vs 15.6 in), the higher refresh rate (170 Hz vs 60 Hz) and the lower response time (1ms (VRB) vs 6.5 ms).

    Choose ViewSonic VG1655 if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.

    Price comparison

    RetailerAcer Nitro XV320QUViewSonic VG1655
    AmazonView on Amazon

    Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

    Verdict

    Acer Nitro XV320QU

    7.8 / 10 Expert Rating

    A practical, larger-format value gaming monitor whose built-in KVM switch adds real convenience for dual-PC users.

    ViewSonic VG1655

    7.2 / 10 Expert Rating

    A dependable, VESA-friendly business portable monitor, best suited to fleet purchases and hybrid desk setups.

    More comparisons in Monitors