Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Acer Predator XB273U vs LG UltraFine 32UN880-B: Comparison

Acer Predator XB273U vs LG UltraFine 32UN880-B: the refresh rate difference

Start with refresh rate, because it is the widest measured gap between them: Acer Predator XB273U 165 Hz against LG UltraFine 32UN880-B 60 Hz, 64% in favour of Acer Predator XB273U. LG UltraFine 32UN880-B also leads on screen size, 27 in on the Acer Predator XB273U versus 31.5 in on the LG UltraFine 32UN880-B. There is a split on color gamut as well, 95% DCI-P3 on the Acer Predator XB273U versus ~95% DCI-P3 on the LG UltraFine 32UN880-B.

Acer Predator XB273U vs LG UltraFine 32UN880-B: which one fits your build

The Acer Predator XB273U is the one to take for gamers wanting reliable QHD performance at 170Hz and buyers who value sturdy build quality, though it is not the pick for buyers wanting USB-C connectivity and minimalist desk aesthetics. Buy the LG UltraFine 32UN880-B for standing-desk users wanting full height and angle adjustment and laptop users wanting single-cable 4K with charging, though it is not built for colorists needing wide-gamut precision and gamers wanting high refresh rates. The same goes for buyers who want to reclaim desk space from a traditional stand. Our rating of the Acer Predator XB273U (8.1/10): A solid, no-surprises 27-inch QHD gaming monitor that competes well against the segment's established favorites. Our rating of the LG UltraFine 32UN880-B (8.1/10): A strong ergonomic pick for 4K desk setups where flexible positioning matters as much as image quality.

What Acer Predator XB273U and LG UltraFine 32UN880-B have in common

Where they agree, they agree completely, panel type, hdr support, hdr formats, aspect ratio and dci-p3 coverage included, so the decision does not turn on any of those.

Frequently asked questions

Do the Acer Predator XB273U and LG UltraFine 32UN880-B differ on resolution?

Yes. Resolution reads 2560 x 1440 on the Acer Predator XB273U versus 3840 x 2160 on the LG UltraFine 32UN880-B.

Specs and benchmarks

  • Panel Type

    Acer Predator XB273U
    IPS
    LG UltraFine 32UN880-B
    IPS
  • Brand

    Acer Predator XB273U
    Acer
    LG UltraFine 32UN880-B
    LG
  • Model Number

    Acer Predator XB273U
    XB273U GS
    LG UltraFine 32UN880-B
    32UN880-B
  • Screen Size

    Acer Predator XB273U
    27 in-14%
    LG UltraFine 32UN880-B
    31.5 inBest
  • Resolution

    Acer Predator XB273U
    2560 x 1440 (QHD)
    LG UltraFine 32UN880-B
    3840 x 2160 (4K UHD)
  • Aspect Ratio

    Acer Predator XB273U
    16:9
    LG UltraFine 32UN880-B
    16:9
  • Refresh Rate

    Acer Predator XB273U
    165 HzBest
    LG UltraFine 32UN880-B
    60 Hz-64%
  • Response Time

    Acer Predator XB273U
    1 msBest
    LG UltraFine 32UN880-B
    5ms (GtG)
  • Adaptive Sync

    Acer Predator XB273U
    NVIDIA G-Sync Compatible
    LG UltraFine 32UN880-B
    AMD FreeSync
  • HDR Support

    Acer Predator XB273U
    Yes
    LG UltraFine 32UN880-B
    Yes
  • Native Resolution

    Acer Predator XB273U
    2560x1440
    LG UltraFine 32UN880-B
    3840x2160
  • DCI-P3 Coverage

    Acer Predator XB273U
    95 %
    LG UltraFine 32UN880-B
    95 %
  • Series

    Acer Predator XB273U
    Predator XB273U
    LG UltraFine 32UN880-B
    UltraFine Ergo
  • Color Gamut

    Acer Predator XB273U
    95% DCI-P3
    LG UltraFine 32UN880-B
    ~95% DCI-P3
  • HDR Formats

    Acer Predator XB273U
    HDR10
    LG UltraFine 32UN880-B
    HDR10

    Which one should you pick?

    Choose Acer Predator XB273U if you want the higher refresh rate (165 Hz vs 60 Hz) and the lower response time (1 ms vs 5ms (GtG)).

    Choose LG UltraFine 32UN880-B if you want the higher screen size (31.5 in vs 27 in).

    Verdict

    Acer Predator XB273U

    8.1 / 10 Expert Rating

    A solid, no-surprises 27-inch QHD gaming monitor that competes well against the segment's established favorites.

    LG UltraFine 32UN880-B

    8.1 / 10 Expert Rating

    A strong ergonomic pick for 4K desk setups where flexible positioning matters as much as image quality.

    More comparisons in Monitors