Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
AOC 27G4X vs Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240: Comparison
AOC 27G4X and Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 separate most on response time: AOC 27G4X at 1 ms, Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240 at 0.03 ms, 3233% in favour of Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240. Screen Size splits them by another 40%, again favouring Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240. They match on hdr support, panel coating and displayport version.
Specs
| Specification |  |  |
|---|---|---|
| Panel Type | IPS | WOLED |
| Brand | AOC | Corsair |
| Model Number | 27G4X | 45WQHD240 |
| Screen Size | 27 in-40% | 45 in |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) | 3440 x 1440 (UWQHD) |
| Panel Technology | IPS | WOLED |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 21:9 |
| Refresh Rate | 180 Hz-25% | 240 Hz |
| Response Time | 1 ms-3233% | 0.03 ms |
| Adaptive Sync | Adaptive-Sync, NVIDIA G-Sync Compatible | AMD FreeSync Premium, NVIDIA G-Sync Compatible |
| HDR Support | Yes | Yes |
| Curved | No | Yes |
| Panel Coating | Matte anti-glare | Matte anti-glare |
| Native Resolution | 1920x1080 | 3440x1440 |
| Max Refresh Rate | 180 Hz-25% | 240 Hz |
| Response Time GtG | 1 ms | 0.03 ms |
| VRR Standard | G-Sync Compatible | FreeSync Premium |
| HDR Certification | HDR10 signal only | DisplayHDR True Black 400 |
| DCI-P3 Coverage | 95.5 % | 98.5 % |
| DisplayPort Version | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| Series | AOC Gaming 27G4X | Xeneon Flex |
| Color Gamut | 128.3% sRGB, 95.5% DCI-P3 | 98.5% DCI-P3 |
| Source URL | https://www.aoc.com/my/gaming/monitors/27g4x | https://www.corsair.com/us/en/p/monitors/cm-9030001-na/corsair-xeneon-flex-45wqhd240-45-inch-oled-3440-x1440-240hz-refresh-rate-bendable-gaming-monitor-cm-9030001-na |
Verdict
AOC 27G4X
7.6 / 10 Expert Rating
An aggressively priced high-refresh QHD monitor that delivers solid core gaming performance without extra frills.
Corsair Xeneon Flex 45WQHD240
8.7 / 10 Expert Rating
A genuinely innovative ultrawide OLED monitor whose bendable design solves the flat-versus-curved tradeoff better than any competitor.