Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 vs Intel Celeron G6900TE: Comparison
AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 and Intel Celeron G6900TE separate most on l3 cache: AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 at 16 MB, Intel Celeron G6900TE at 4 MB, 75% in favour of AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48. L2 Cache splits them by another 38%, again favouring AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48.
Specs
| Specification | ![]() | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Form Factor | Embedded | Desktop |
| TDP | 45 W | 35 W |
| Socket | FP7r2 | LGA1700 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 2.5 MB-37% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 4 MB-75% |
| Memory Type | DDR5 | DDR5 or DDR4 |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 16-20% |
| Cores | 8 | 2 |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
Verdict
Intel Celeron G6900TE
6.6 / 10 Expert Rating
The Intel Celeron G6900TE is a rock-bottom entry chip, fine for the lightest computing tasks and nothing more.
More comparisons in Processors (CPUs)
- AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 vs Intel Atom x7213E
- Intel Atom x7425E vs Intel Celeron G6900TE
- AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 vs Intel Atom x7211E
- AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 125HL
- AMD Ryzen Embedded V2718 with Radeon Graphics vs AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48
- AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C16 vs AMD Ryzen Embedded V3C48




