Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison

Core Ultra 7 265 vs Core Ultra 7 265F integrated graphics compared

The first real difference is integrated graphics: Core Ultra 7 265 Yes against Core Ultra 7 265F No. Measured rather than claimed: in Blender Cycles (CPU) the Core Ultra 7 265 returns 376 against 359 over 12 runs, a 5% lead. There is a split on igpu as well, Intel Graphics on the Core Ultra 7 265 versus None on the Core Ultra 7 265F.

Core Ultra 7 265 vs Core Ultra 7 265F: which one fits your build

The Core Ultra 7 265 is the one to take for desktop gaming and everyday productivity, though it is the wrong buy for laptops and fanless designs. Buy the Core Ultra 7 265F for desktop gaming and everyday productivity, though it is not the pick for laptops and fanless designs. Our rating of the Core Ultra 7 265 (8.5/10): the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is a mainstream desktop Arrow Lake-S processor with integrated graphics, suited to everyday desktop builds. Our rating of the Core Ultra 7 265F (8.4/10): the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is the graphics-less variant of the 265, a good value pick for builds already using a discrete GPU.

What Core Ultra 7 265 and Core Ultra 7 265F have in common

Where they agree, they agree completely, total cores, performance cores, efficiency cores, total threads and p-core boost clock included, so the decision does not turn on any of those. They match on 13 further specifications as well.

Frequently asked questions

Is the P-Core Base Clock the same on the Core Ultra 7 265 and Core Ultra 7 265F?

It is. Both are listed at 2.4 GHz, so it is not a reason to pick one over the other.

Specs and benchmarks

  • Form Factor

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265
    Desktop
    Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
    Desktop
  • Codename

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265
    Arrow Lake
    Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
    Arrow Lake
  • Release Year

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265
    2025
    Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
    2025
  • TDP

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265
    65 W
    Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
    65 W
  • iGPU

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265
    Intel Graphics
    Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
    None
  • Market Segment

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265
    Desktop
    Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
    Desktop
  • Microarchitecture

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265
    Arrow Lake-S
    Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
    Arrow Lake-S
  • Socket

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265
    FCLGA1851
    Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
    FCLGA1851
  • Process Node

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265
    3 nm
    Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
    3 nm
  • Total Cores

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265
    20
    Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
    20
  • Performance Cores

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265
    8
    Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
    8
  • Efficiency Cores

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265
    12
    Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
    12
  • Total Threads

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265
    20
    Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
    20
  • SMT Enabled

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265
    No
    Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
    No
  • P-Core Base Clock

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265
    2.4 GHz
    Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
    2.4 GHz
  • P-Core Boost Clock

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265
    5.3 GHz
    Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
    5.3 GHz
  • L3 Cache

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265
    30 MB
    Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
    30 MB
  • Base Power

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265
    65 W
    Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
    65 W
  • Max Turbo Power

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265
    182 W
    Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
    182 W
  • Memory Type

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265
    DDR5
    Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
    DDR5
  • Integrated Graphics

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265
    Yes
    Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
    No
  • NPU Peak TOPS

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265
    13 TOPS (NPU 3)
    Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
    13 TOPS (NPU 3)

Benchmarks

  • 3D Rendering
  • Blender Cycles (CPU)

    Intel Core Ultra 7 265
    376Best
    Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
    359-5%

    Blender 4.5, Blender Open Data (CC0). Median of monster + junkshop + classroom, combined samples/min.

    Renders a 3D scene using every core. Shows speed for 3D and rendering work, not gaming.

Which one should you pick?

Choose Intel Core Ultra 7 265 if you want the higher L3 cache (30 MB vs 30 MB) and the higher blender cycles (CPU) (376 vs 359).

Choose Intel Core Ultra 7 265F if you already have it on hand or find it at a lower price.

Price comparison

RetailerIntel Core Ultra 7 265Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
AmazonView on AmazonView on Amazon
NeweggView on NeweggView on Newegg

Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.

Verdict

Intel Core Ultra 7 265

8.5 / 10 Expert Rating

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is a mainstream desktop Arrow Lake-S processor with integrated graphics, suited to everyday desktop builds.

Intel Core Ultra 7 265F

8.4 / 10 Expert Rating

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265F is the graphics-less variant of the 265, a good value pick for builds already using a discrete GPU.

More comparisons in Processors (CPUs)