Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLABK 16GB DDR5-6000 CL30 Black: Comparison
AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLABK cas latency compared
The gap that matters here is cas latency: AD4U3200716G22-BADZ 22 against XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLABK 30, which puts AD4U3200716G22-BADZ 36% ahead. Add true latency to that, 13.8 ns on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 10.0 ns on the XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLABK, and the pattern holds. Add peak bandwidth to that, 25.6 GB/s on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 48.0 GB/s on the XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLABK, and the pattern holds. They differ on ddr generation too, DDR4 on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus DDR5 on the XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLABK. There is a split on ram segment as well, Industrial/Embedded on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DDR5 on the XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLABK. Form factor is not the same on both, DIMM on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DIMM on the XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLABK.
Who each one is for
The XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLABK suits Non-RGB single-stick upgrades on AM5 or Intel and buyers wanting a clean, minimal look, though it is not the pick for buyers wanting RGB lighting.
Where the two are identical
Everything else lines up. Capacity per module and module count read the same on both, so those are not worth weighing.
Specs and benchmarks
Speed Score
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- –
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLABK 16GB DDR5-6000 CL30 Black
- 8.3/10
DDR4 and DDR5 kits are scored on separate scales, so these two scores can't be compared directly. Your motherboard supports only one of the two.
DDR Generation
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DDR4
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLABK 16GB DDR5-6000 CL30 Black
- DDR5
Brand
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLABK 16GB DDR5-6000 CL30 Black
- ADATA
Part Number
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLABK 16GB DDR5-6000 CL30 Black
- AX5U6000C3016G-BLABK
Series
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA Industrial
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLABK 16GB DDR5-6000 CL30 Black
- XPG Lancer Blade
CAS Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 22Best
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLABK 16GB DDR5-6000 CL30 Black
- 30-36%
Module Count
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 1
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLABK 16GB DDR5-6000 CL30 Black
- 1
RAM Segment
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Industrial/Embedded
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLABK 16GB DDR5-6000 CL30 Black
- Desktop DDR5
Form Factor
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DIMM
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLABK 16GB DDR5-6000 CL30 Black
- Desktop DIMM
Capacity Per Module
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 16 GB
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLABK 16GB DDR5-6000 CL30 Black
- 16 GB
True Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 13.8 ns-38%
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLABK 16GB DDR5-6000 CL30 Black
- 10.0 nsBest
Peak Bandwidth
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 25.6 GB/s-47%
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLABK 16GB DDR5-6000 CL30 Black
- 48.0 GB/sBest
Which one should you pick?
Choose ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ if you want the lower CAS latency (22 vs 30) and the higher capacity per module (16 GB vs 16 GB).
Choose ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLABK 16GB DDR5-6000 CL30 Black if you want the lower true latency (10.0 ns vs 13.8 ns) and the higher peak bandwidth (48.0 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s).
Price comparison
| Retailer | ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ | ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLABK 16GB DDR5-6000 CL30 Black |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.