Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLAWH 16GB DDR5-6000 CL30 White: Comparison
AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLAWH cas latency compared
The gap that matters here is cas latency: AD4U3200716G22-BADZ 22 against XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLAWH 30, which puts AD4U3200716G22-BADZ 36% ahead. True latency runs the same way, 13.8 ns on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 10.0 ns on the XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLAWH, another win for XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLAWH. Peak bandwidth runs the same way, 25.6 GB/s on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 48.0 GB/s on the XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLAWH, another win for XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLAWH. There is a split on ddr generation as well, DDR4 on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus DDR5 on the XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLAWH. Ram segment is not the same on both, Industrial/Embedded on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DDR5 on the XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLAWH. They differ on form factor too, DIMM on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DIMM on the XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLAWH.
AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLAWH: which one fits your build
The XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLAWH is the one to take for Non-RGB white builds and AM5 or Intel single-stick upgrades wanting fast timings, though it is not the pick for buyers wanting RGB lighting (see the Lancer Blade RGB line).
Where the two are identical
The common ground is wider than the gap: capacity per module and module count are identical here.
Specs and benchmarks
Speed Score
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- –
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLAWH 16GB DDR5-6000 CL30 White
- 8.3/10
DDR4 and DDR5 kits are scored on separate scales, so these two scores can't be compared directly. Your motherboard supports only one of the two.
DDR Generation
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DDR4
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLAWH 16GB DDR5-6000 CL30 White
- DDR5
Brand
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLAWH 16GB DDR5-6000 CL30 White
- ADATA
Part Number
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLAWH 16GB DDR5-6000 CL30 White
- AX5U6000C3016G-BLAWH
Series
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA Industrial
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLAWH 16GB DDR5-6000 CL30 White
- XPG Lancer Blade
CAS Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 22Best
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLAWH 16GB DDR5-6000 CL30 White
- 30-36%
Module Count
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 1
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLAWH 16GB DDR5-6000 CL30 White
- 1
RAM Segment
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Industrial/Embedded
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLAWH 16GB DDR5-6000 CL30 White
- Desktop DDR5
Form Factor
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DIMM
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLAWH 16GB DDR5-6000 CL30 White
- Desktop DIMM
Capacity Per Module
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 16 GB
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLAWH 16GB DDR5-6000 CL30 White
- 16 GB
True Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 13.8 ns-38%
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLAWH 16GB DDR5-6000 CL30 White
- 10.0 nsBest
Peak Bandwidth
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 25.6 GB/s-47%
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLAWH 16GB DDR5-6000 CL30 White
- 48.0 GB/sBest
Which one should you pick?
Choose ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ if you want the lower CAS latency (22 vs 30) and the higher capacity per module (16 GB vs 16 GB).
Choose ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3016G-BLAWH 16GB DDR5-6000 CL30 White if you want the lower true latency (10.0 ns vs 13.8 ns) and the higher peak bandwidth (48.0 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s).