Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3032G-DTLABWH 64GB: Comparison
AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3032G-DTLABWH: the capacity per module difference
On capacity per module the spread is 50%, AD4U3200716G22-BADZ 16 GB against XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3032G-DTLABWH 32 GB, so XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3032G-DTLABWH takes it. Add cas latency to that, 22 on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 30 on the XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3032G-DTLABWH, and the pattern holds. True latency runs the same way, 13.8 ns on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 10.0 ns on the XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3032G-DTLABWH, another win for XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3032G-DTLABWH. XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3032G-DTLABWH also leads on peak bandwidth, 25.6 GB/s on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 96.0 GB/s on the XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3032G-DTLABWH. Ddr generation is not the same on both, DDR4 on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus DDR5 on the XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3032G-DTLABWH. They differ on module count too, 1 on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 2 on the XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3032G-DTLABWH. They differ on ram segment too, Industrial/Embedded on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DDR5 on the XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3032G-DTLABWH. There is a split on form factor as well, DIMM on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DIMM on the XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3032G-DTLABWH.
AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3032G-DTLABWH: which one fits your build
The XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3032G-DTLABWH is the one to take for desktop PC builds needing DDR5 memory, though it is not built for adding a second kit later for four sticks.
Specs and benchmarks
Speed Score
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- –
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3032G-DTLABWH 64GB
- 8.3/10
DDR4 and DDR5 kits are scored on separate scales, so these two scores can't be compared directly. Your motherboard supports only one of the two.
DDR Generation
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DDR4
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3032G-DTLABWH 64GB
- DDR5
Brand
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3032G-DTLABWH 64GB
- ADATA
Part Number
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3032G-DTLABWH 64GB
- AX5U6000C3032G-DTLABWH
Series
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA Industrial
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3032G-DTLABWH 64GB
- Lancer Blade
CAS Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 22Best
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3032G-DTLABWH 64GB
- 30-36%
Module Count
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 1
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3032G-DTLABWH 64GB
- 2
RAM Segment
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Industrial/Embedded
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3032G-DTLABWH 64GB
- Desktop DDR5
Form Factor
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DIMM
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3032G-DTLABWH 64GB
- Desktop DIMM
Capacity Per Module
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 16 GB-50%
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3032G-DTLABWH 64GB
- 32 GBBest
True Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 13.8 ns-38%
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3032G-DTLABWH 64GB
- 10.0 nsBest
Peak Bandwidth
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 25.6 GB/s-73%
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3032G-DTLABWH 64GB
- 96.0 GB/sBest
Which one should you pick?
Choose ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ if you want the lower CAS latency (22 vs 30).
Choose ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6000C3032G-DTLABWH 64GB if you want the higher capacity per module (32 GB vs 16 GB), the lower true latency (10.0 ns vs 13.8 ns) and the higher peak bandwidth (96.0 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s).