Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6400C3216G-BLABBK 16GB DDR5-6400 CL32 Black: Comparison
AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6400C3216G-BLABBK cas latency compared
On cas latency the spread is 45%, AD4U3200716G22-BADZ 22 against XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6400C3216G-BLABBK 32, so AD4U3200716G22-BADZ takes it. XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6400C3216G-BLABBK also leads on true latency, 13.8 ns on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 10.0 ns on the XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6400C3216G-BLABBK. Add peak bandwidth to that, 25.6 GB/s on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 51.2 GB/s on the XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6400C3216G-BLABBK, and the pattern holds. They differ on ddr generation too, DDR4 on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus DDR5 on the XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6400C3216G-BLABBK. Ram segment is not the same on both, Industrial/Embedded on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DDR5 on the XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6400C3216G-BLABBK. They differ on form factor too, DIMM on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DIMM on the XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6400C3216G-BLABBK.
Which should you buy, AD4U3200716G22-BADZ or XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6400C3216G-BLABBK?
Buy the XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6400C3216G-BLABBK for Non-RGB builds wanting a clean, minimal look and Intel platforms with native DDR5-6400 support, though it is not built for AM5 builds (use the 6000MT/s SKU instead) and buyers wanting RGB lighting.
Where the two are identical
Everything else lines up. Capacity per module and module count read the same on both, so those are not worth weighing.
Specs and benchmarks
Speed Score
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- –
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6400C3216G-BLABBK 16GB DDR5-6400 CL32 Black
- 8.8/10
DDR4 and DDR5 kits are scored on separate scales, so these two scores can't be compared directly. Your motherboard supports only one of the two.
DDR Generation
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DDR4
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6400C3216G-BLABBK 16GB DDR5-6400 CL32 Black
- DDR5
Brand
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6400C3216G-BLABBK 16GB DDR5-6400 CL32 Black
- ADATA
Part Number
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6400C3216G-BLABBK 16GB DDR5-6400 CL32 Black
- AX5U6400C3216G-BLABBK
Series
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA Industrial
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6400C3216G-BLABBK 16GB DDR5-6400 CL32 Black
- XPG Lancer Blade
CAS Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 22Best
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6400C3216G-BLABBK 16GB DDR5-6400 CL32 Black
- 32-45%
Module Count
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 1
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6400C3216G-BLABBK 16GB DDR5-6400 CL32 Black
- 1
RAM Segment
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Industrial/Embedded
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6400C3216G-BLABBK 16GB DDR5-6400 CL32 Black
- Desktop DDR5
Form Factor
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DIMM
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6400C3216G-BLABBK 16GB DDR5-6400 CL32 Black
- Desktop DIMM
Capacity Per Module
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 16 GB
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6400C3216G-BLABBK 16GB DDR5-6400 CL32 Black
- 16 GB
True Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 13.8 ns-38%
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6400C3216G-BLABBK 16GB DDR5-6400 CL32 Black
- 10.0 nsBest
Peak Bandwidth
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 25.6 GB/s-50%
- ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6400C3216G-BLABBK 16GB DDR5-6400 CL32 Black
- 51.2 GB/sBest
Which one should you pick?
Choose ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ if you want the lower CAS latency (22 vs 32) and the higher capacity per module (16 GB vs 16 GB).
Choose ADATA XPG Lancer Blade AX5U6400C3216G-BLABBK 16GB DDR5-6400 CL32 Black if you want the lower true latency (10.0 ns vs 13.8 ns) and the higher peak bandwidth (51.2 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s).