Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs ADATA XPG Caster RGB AX5U6000C3032G-DCCARBK: Comparison
What is the difference between AD4U3200716G22-BADZ and XPG Caster RGB AX5U6000C3032G-DCCARBK?
On capacity per module the spread is 50%, AD4U3200716G22-BADZ 16 GB against XPG Caster RGB AX5U6000C3032G-DCCARBK 32 GB, so XPG Caster RGB AX5U6000C3032G-DCCARBK takes it. Cas latency runs the same way, 22 on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 30 on the XPG Caster RGB AX5U6000C3032G-DCCARBK, another win for AD4U3200716G22-BADZ. XPG Caster RGB AX5U6000C3032G-DCCARBK also leads on true latency, 13.8 ns on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 10.0 ns on the XPG Caster RGB AX5U6000C3032G-DCCARBK. Add peak bandwidth to that, 25.6 GB/s on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 96.0 GB/s on the XPG Caster RGB AX5U6000C3032G-DCCARBK, and the pattern holds. Ddr generation is not the same on both, DDR4 on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus DDR5 on the XPG Caster RGB AX5U6000C3032G-DCCARBK. They differ on module count too, 1 on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 2 on the XPG Caster RGB AX5U6000C3032G-DCCARBK. They differ on ram segment too, Industrial/Embedded on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DDR5 on the XPG Caster RGB AX5U6000C3032G-DCCARBK. There is a split on form factor as well, DIMM on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus UDIMM on the XPG Caster RGB AX5U6000C3032G-DCCARBK.
AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs XPG Caster RGB AX5U6000C3032G-DCCARBK: which one fits your build
Buy the XPG Caster RGB AX5U6000C3032G-DCCARBK for hybrid gaming/creation PCs and AM5 and Intel 600/700-series builds, though it is not the pick for entry-level budget builds and Non-RGB preference.
Specs and benchmarks
Speed Score
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- –
- ADATA XPG Caster RGB AX5U6000C3032G-DCCARBK
- 8.3/10
DDR4 and DDR5 kits are scored on separate scales, so these two scores can't be compared directly. Your motherboard supports only one of the two.
DDR Generation
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DDR4
- ADATA XPG Caster RGB AX5U6000C3032G-DCCARBK
- DDR5
Brand
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA
- ADATA XPG Caster RGB AX5U6000C3032G-DCCARBK
- ADATA
Part Number
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA XPG Caster RGB AX5U6000C3032G-DCCARBK
- AX5U6000C3032G-DCCARBK
Series
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA Industrial
- ADATA XPG Caster RGB AX5U6000C3032G-DCCARBK
- XPG Caster RGB
CAS Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 22Best
- ADATA XPG Caster RGB AX5U6000C3032G-DCCARBK
- 30-36%
Module Count
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 1
- ADATA XPG Caster RGB AX5U6000C3032G-DCCARBK
- 2
RAM Segment
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Industrial/Embedded
- ADATA XPG Caster RGB AX5U6000C3032G-DCCARBK
- Desktop DDR5
Form Factor
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DIMM
- ADATA XPG Caster RGB AX5U6000C3032G-DCCARBK
- UDIMM
Capacity Per Module
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 16 GB-50%
- ADATA XPG Caster RGB AX5U6000C3032G-DCCARBK
- 32 GBBest
True Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 13.8 ns-38%
- ADATA XPG Caster RGB AX5U6000C3032G-DCCARBK
- 10.0 nsBest
Peak Bandwidth
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 25.6 GB/s-73%
- ADATA XPG Caster RGB AX5U6000C3032G-DCCARBK
- 96.0 GB/sBest
Which one should you pick?
Choose ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ if you want the lower CAS latency (22 vs 30).
Choose ADATA XPG Caster RGB AX5U6000C3032G-DCCARBK if you want the higher capacity per module (32 GB vs 16 GB), the lower true latency (10.0 ns vs 13.8 ns) and the higher peak bandwidth (96.0 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s).