Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs ADATA XPG Caster RGB AX5U6400C3264G-DCCARBK: Comparison
AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs XPG Caster RGB AX5U6400C3264G-DCCARBK: the capacity per module difference
Capacity per module is where these two genuinely part company, AD4U3200716G22-BADZ 16 GB against XPG Caster RGB AX5U6400C3264G-DCCARBK 64 GB, a 75% lead for XPG Caster RGB AX5U6400C3264G-DCCARBK. Cas latency runs the same way, 22 on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 32 on the XPG Caster RGB AX5U6400C3264G-DCCARBK, another win for AD4U3200716G22-BADZ. Add true latency to that, 13.8 ns on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 10.0 ns on the XPG Caster RGB AX5U6400C3264G-DCCARBK, and the pattern holds. XPG Caster RGB AX5U6400C3264G-DCCARBK also leads on peak bandwidth, 25.6 GB/s on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 102.4 GB/s on the XPG Caster RGB AX5U6400C3264G-DCCARBK. Ddr generation is not the same on both, DDR4 on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus DDR5 on the XPG Caster RGB AX5U6400C3264G-DCCARBK. There is a split on module count as well, 1 on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 2 on the XPG Caster RGB AX5U6400C3264G-DCCARBK. There is a split on ram segment as well, Industrial/Embedded on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DDR5 on the XPG Caster RGB AX5U6400C3264G-DCCARBK. They differ on form factor too, DIMM on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus UDIMM on the XPG Caster RGB AX5U6400C3264G-DCCARBK.
AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs XPG Caster RGB AX5U6400C3264G-DCCARBK: which one fits your build
The XPG Caster RGB AX5U6400C3264G-DCCARBK is the one to take for high-end workstations and 8K video editing, though it is not built for budget builds and boards without 128GB dual-channel support.
Specs and benchmarks
Speed Score
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- –
- ADATA XPG Caster RGB AX5U6400C3264G-DCCARBK
- 8.8/10
DDR4 and DDR5 kits are scored on separate scales, so these two scores can't be compared directly. Your motherboard supports only one of the two.
DDR Generation
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DDR4
- ADATA XPG Caster RGB AX5U6400C3264G-DCCARBK
- DDR5
Brand
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA
- ADATA XPG Caster RGB AX5U6400C3264G-DCCARBK
- ADATA
Part Number
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA XPG Caster RGB AX5U6400C3264G-DCCARBK
- AX5U6400C3264G-DCCARBK
Series
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA Industrial
- ADATA XPG Caster RGB AX5U6400C3264G-DCCARBK
- XPG Caster RGB
CAS Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 22Best
- ADATA XPG Caster RGB AX5U6400C3264G-DCCARBK
- 32-45%
Module Count
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 1
- ADATA XPG Caster RGB AX5U6400C3264G-DCCARBK
- 2
RAM Segment
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Industrial/Embedded
- ADATA XPG Caster RGB AX5U6400C3264G-DCCARBK
- Desktop DDR5
Form Factor
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DIMM
- ADATA XPG Caster RGB AX5U6400C3264G-DCCARBK
- UDIMM
Capacity Per Module
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 16 GB-75%
- ADATA XPG Caster RGB AX5U6400C3264G-DCCARBK
- 64 GBBest
True Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 13.8 ns-38%
- ADATA XPG Caster RGB AX5U6400C3264G-DCCARBK
- 10.0 nsBest
Peak Bandwidth
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 25.6 GB/s-75%
- ADATA XPG Caster RGB AX5U6400C3264G-DCCARBK
- 102.4 GB/sBest
Which one should you pick?
Choose ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ if you want the lower CAS latency (22 vs 32).
Choose ADATA XPG Caster RGB AX5U6400C3264G-DCCARBK if you want the higher capacity per module (64 GB vs 16 GB), the lower true latency (10.0 ns vs 13.8 ns) and the higher peak bandwidth (102.4 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s).