Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs ADATA XPG Lancer RGB AX5U6400C3232G-DCLARWH: Comparison
AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs XPG Lancer RGB AX5U6400C3232G-DCLARWH capacity per module compared
The gap that matters here is capacity per module: AD4U3200716G22-BADZ 16 GB against XPG Lancer RGB AX5U6400C3232G-DCLARWH 32 GB, which puts XPG Lancer RGB AX5U6400C3232G-DCLARWH 50% ahead. AD4U3200716G22-BADZ also leads on cas latency, 22 on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 32 on the XPG Lancer RGB AX5U6400C3232G-DCLARWH. XPG Lancer RGB AX5U6400C3232G-DCLARWH also leads on true latency, 13.8 ns on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 10.0 ns on the XPG Lancer RGB AX5U6400C3232G-DCLARWH. Add peak bandwidth to that, 25.6 GB/s on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 102.4 GB/s on the XPG Lancer RGB AX5U6400C3232G-DCLARWH, and the pattern holds. There is a split on ddr generation as well, DDR4 on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus DDR5 on the XPG Lancer RGB AX5U6400C3232G-DCLARWH. Module count is not the same on both, 1 on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 2 on the XPG Lancer RGB AX5U6400C3232G-DCLARWH. They differ on ram segment too, Industrial/Embedded on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DDR5 on the XPG Lancer RGB AX5U6400C3232G-DCLARWH. There is a split on form factor as well, DIMM on the AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus UDIMM on the XPG Lancer RGB AX5U6400C3232G-DCLARWH.
Which should you buy, AD4U3200716G22-BADZ or XPG Lancer RGB AX5U6400C3232G-DCLARWH?
The XPG Lancer RGB AX5U6400C3232G-DCLARWH is the one to take for enthusiast white-themed builds and gaming + streaming rigs, though it is not the pick for strict budget builds and Non-RGB preference.
Specs and benchmarks
Speed Score
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- –
- ADATA XPG Lancer RGB AX5U6400C3232G-DCLARWH
- 8.8/10
DDR4 and DDR5 kits are scored on separate scales, so these two scores can't be compared directly. Your motherboard supports only one of the two.
DDR Generation
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DDR4
- ADATA XPG Lancer RGB AX5U6400C3232G-DCLARWH
- DDR5
Brand
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA
- ADATA XPG Lancer RGB AX5U6400C3232G-DCLARWH
- ADATA
Part Number
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA XPG Lancer RGB AX5U6400C3232G-DCLARWH
- AX5U6400C3232G-DCLARWH
Series
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA Industrial
- ADATA XPG Lancer RGB AX5U6400C3232G-DCLARWH
- XPG Lancer RGB
CAS Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 22Best
- ADATA XPG Lancer RGB AX5U6400C3232G-DCLARWH
- 32-45%
Module Count
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 1
- ADATA XPG Lancer RGB AX5U6400C3232G-DCLARWH
- 2
RAM Segment
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Industrial/Embedded
- ADATA XPG Lancer RGB AX5U6400C3232G-DCLARWH
- Desktop DDR5
Form Factor
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DIMM
- ADATA XPG Lancer RGB AX5U6400C3232G-DCLARWH
- UDIMM
Capacity Per Module
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 16 GB-50%
- ADATA XPG Lancer RGB AX5U6400C3232G-DCLARWH
- 32 GBBest
True Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 13.8 ns-38%
- ADATA XPG Lancer RGB AX5U6400C3232G-DCLARWH
- 10.0 nsBest
Peak Bandwidth
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 25.6 GB/s-75%
- ADATA XPG Lancer RGB AX5U6400C3232G-DCLARWH
- 102.4 GB/sBest
Which one should you pick?
Choose ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ if you want the lower CAS latency (22 vs 32).
Choose ADATA XPG Lancer RGB AX5U6400C3232G-DCLARWH if you want the higher capacity per module (32 GB vs 16 GB), the lower true latency (10.0 ns vs 13.8 ns) and the higher peak bandwidth (102.4 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s).
Price comparison
| Retailer | ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ | ADATA XPG Lancer RGB AX5U6400C3232G-DCLARWH |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon | View on Amazon |
Disclaimer: The price and specification of the given product may differ from the actual product. Please confirm on the retailer's website before buying.