Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs Corsair CMH5X16G1B60C40A2: Comparison
ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs Corsair CMH5X16G1B60C40A2: the cas latency difference
The gap that matters here is cas latency: ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ 22 against Corsair CMH5X16G1B60C40A2 40, which puts ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ 82% ahead. On true latency there is little in it, 13.8 ns on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 13.3 ns on the Corsair CMH5X16G1B60C40A2. Add peak bandwidth to that, 25.6 GB/s on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 48.0 GB/s on the Corsair CMH5X16G1B60C40A2, and the pattern holds. They differ on ddr generation too, DDR4 on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus DDR5 on the Corsair CMH5X16G1B60C40A2. There is a split on ram segment as well, Industrial/Embedded on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DDR5 on the Corsair CMH5X16G1B60C40A2. Form factor is not the same on both, DIMM on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DIMM on the Corsair CMH5X16G1B60C40A2. They differ on platform optimisation too, JEDEC Only on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus AM5 on the Corsair CMH5X16G1B60C40A2.
Who each one is for
The Corsair CMH5X16G1B60C40A2 suits matching an existing 6000MT/s Vengeance RGB single module and adding RGB-lit capacity to a single-module AM5 build. It is not the one for new builds, a matched Vengeance RGB kit like CMH32GX5M2B6400C32 is the better choice.
Where the two are identical
The common ground is wider than the gap: capacity per module and module count are identical here.
Specs and benchmarks
Speed Score
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- –
- Corsair CMH5X16G1B60C40A2
- 7.0/10
DDR4 and DDR5 kits are scored on separate scales, so these two scores can't be compared directly. Your motherboard supports only one of the two.
DDR Generation
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DDR4
- Corsair CMH5X16G1B60C40A2
- DDR5
Brand
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA
- Corsair CMH5X16G1B60C40A2
- Corsair
Part Number
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Corsair CMH5X16G1B60C40A2
- CMH5X16G1B60C40A2
CAS Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 22Best
- Corsair CMH5X16G1B60C40A2
- 40-82%
Module Count
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 1
- Corsair CMH5X16G1B60C40A2
- 1
RAM Segment
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Industrial/Embedded
- Corsair CMH5X16G1B60C40A2
- Desktop DDR5
Form Factor
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DIMM
- Corsair CMH5X16G1B60C40A2
- Desktop DIMM
Platform Optimisation
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- JEDEC Only
- Corsair CMH5X16G1B60C40A2
- AM5
Capacity Per Module
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 16 GB
- Corsair CMH5X16G1B60C40A2
- 16 GB
True Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 13.8 ns-4%
- Corsair CMH5X16G1B60C40A2
- 13.3 nsBest
Peak Bandwidth
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 25.6 GB/s-47%
- Corsair CMH5X16G1B60C40A2
- 48.0 GB/sBest
Which one should you pick?
Choose ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ if you want the lower CAS latency (22 vs 40) and the higher capacity per module (16 GB vs 16 GB).
Choose Corsair CMH5X16G1B60C40A2 if you want the lower true latency (13.3 ns vs 13.8 ns) and the higher peak bandwidth (48.0 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s).