Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs Corsair CMK32GX5M1B5600C40 32GB: Comparison
What is the difference between ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ and Corsair CMK32GX5M1B5600C40 32GB?
The gap that matters here is cas latency: ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ 22 against Corsair CMK32GX5M1B5600C40 32GB 40, which puts ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ 82% ahead. Corsair CMK32GX5M1B5600C40 32GB also leads on capacity per module, 16 GB on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 32 GB on the Corsair CMK32GX5M1B5600C40 32GB. True latency is closer, 13.8 ns on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 14.3 ns on the Corsair CMK32GX5M1B5600C40 32GB. Add peak bandwidth to that, 25.6 GB/s on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 44.8 GB/s on the Corsair CMK32GX5M1B5600C40 32GB, and the pattern holds. They differ on ddr generation too, DDR4 on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus DDR5 on the Corsair CMK32GX5M1B5600C40 32GB. There is a split on ram segment as well, Industrial/Embedded on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DDR5 on the Corsair CMK32GX5M1B5600C40 32GB. Form factor is not the same on both, DIMM on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DIMM on the Corsair CMK32GX5M1B5600C40 32GB. They differ on platform optimisation too, JEDEC Only on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus AM5 on the Corsair CMK32GX5M1B5600C40 32GB.
Who each one is for
it is the wrong buy for manual timing tuning: memory chips are not disclosed. It is not the one for latency-focused builds: 89% of desktop DDR5 kits are as tight or tighter.
Where the two are identical
Where they agree, they agree completely, module count included, so the decision does not turn on any of those.
Specs and benchmarks
Speed Score
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- –
- Corsair CMK32GX5M1B5600C40 32GB
- 6.3/10
DDR4 and DDR5 kits are scored on separate scales, so these two scores can't be compared directly. Your motherboard supports only one of the two.
DDR Generation
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DDR4
- Corsair CMK32GX5M1B5600C40 32GB
- DDR5
Brand
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA
- Corsair CMK32GX5M1B5600C40 32GB
- Corsair
Part Number
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Corsair CMK32GX5M1B5600C40 32GB
- CMK32GX5M1B5600C40
CAS Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 22Best
- Corsair CMK32GX5M1B5600C40 32GB
- 40-82%
Module Count
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 1
- Corsair CMK32GX5M1B5600C40 32GB
- 1
RAM Segment
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Industrial/Embedded
- Corsair CMK32GX5M1B5600C40 32GB
- Desktop DDR5
Form Factor
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DIMM
- Corsair CMK32GX5M1B5600C40 32GB
- Desktop DIMM
Platform Optimisation
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- JEDEC Only
- Corsair CMK32GX5M1B5600C40 32GB
- AM5
Capacity Per Module
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 16 GB-50%
- Corsair CMK32GX5M1B5600C40 32GB
- 32 GBBest
True Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 13.8 nsBest
- Corsair CMK32GX5M1B5600C40 32GB
- 14.3 ns-4%
Peak Bandwidth
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 25.6 GB/s-43%
- Corsair CMK32GX5M1B5600C40 32GB
- 44.8 GB/sBest
Which one should you pick?
Choose ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ if you want the lower CAS latency (22 vs 40) and the lower true latency (13.8 ns vs 14.3 ns).
Choose Corsair CMK32GX5M1B5600C40 32GB if you want the higher capacity per module (32 GB vs 16 GB) and the higher peak bandwidth (44.8 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s).




