Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C36: Comparison
ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C36: the cas latency difference
Start with cas latency, because it is the widest measured gap between them: ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ 22 against Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C36 36, 64% in favour of ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ. Peak bandwidth runs the same way, 25.6 GB/s on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 96.0 GB/s on the Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C36, another win for Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C36. True latency runs the same way, 13.8 ns on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 12.0 ns on the Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C36, another win for Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C36. They differ on ddr generation too, DDR4 on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus DDR5 on the Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C36. There is a split on module count as well, 1 on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 2 on the Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C36. They differ on ram segment too, Industrial/Embedded on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DDR5 on the Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C36. Form factor is not the same on both, DIMM on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DIMM on the Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C36. There is a split on platform optimisation as well, JEDEC Only on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus AM5 on the Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C36.
Who each one is for
Buy the Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C36 for AM5 builds that want the 6000MT/s 1:1 sweet spot, though it is the wrong buy for manual timing tuning: memory chips are not disclosed and adding a second kit later for four sticks. Avoid it for latency-focused builds: 68% of desktop DDR5 kits are as tight or tighter.
What ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ and Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C36 have in common
The common ground is wider than the gap: capacity per module are identical here.
Specs and benchmarks
Speed Score
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- –
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C36
- 7.3/10
DDR4 and DDR5 kits are scored on separate scales, so these two scores can't be compared directly. Your motherboard supports only one of the two.
DDR Generation
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DDR4
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C36
- DDR5
Brand
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C36
- Corsair
Part Number
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C36
- CMK32GX5M2B6000C36
CAS Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 22Best
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C36
- 36-64%
Module Count
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 1
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C36
- 2
RAM Segment
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Industrial/Embedded
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C36
- Desktop DDR5
Form Factor
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DIMM
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C36
- Desktop DIMM
Platform Optimisation
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- JEDEC Only
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C36
- AM5
Capacity Per Module
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 16 GB
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C36
- 16 GB
True Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 13.8 ns-15%
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C36
- 12.0 nsBest
Peak Bandwidth
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 25.6 GB/s-73%
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C36
- 96.0 GB/sBest
Which one should you pick?
Choose ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ if you want the lower CAS latency (22 vs 36) and the higher capacity per module (16 GB vs 16 GB).
Choose Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C36 if you want the lower true latency (12.0 ns vs 13.8 ns) and the higher peak bandwidth (96.0 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s).