Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C40: Comparison
What is the difference between ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ and Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C40?
The gap that matters here is cas latency: ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ 22 against Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C40 40, which puts ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ 82% ahead. Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C40 also leads on peak bandwidth, 25.6 GB/s on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 96.0 GB/s on the Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C40. True latency is closer, 13.8 ns on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 13.3 ns on the Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C40. They differ on ddr generation too, DDR4 on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus DDR5 on the Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C40. Module count is not the same on both, 1 on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 2 on the Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C40. They differ on ram segment too, Industrial/Embedded on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DDR5 on the Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C40. There is a split on form factor as well, DIMM on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DIMM on the Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C40. Platform optimisation is not the same on both, JEDEC Only on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus AM5 on the Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C40.
Who each one is for
The Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C40 is the one to take for AM5 builds that want the 6000MT/s 1:1 sweet spot, though it is the wrong buy for manual timing tuning: memory chips are not disclosed and adding a second kit later for four sticks. It is the wrong buy for latency-focused builds: 83% of desktop DDR5 kits are as tight or tighter.
Where the two are identical
Where they agree, they agree completely, capacity per module included, so the decision does not turn on any of those.
Specs and benchmarks
Speed Score
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- –
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C40
- 7.0/10
DDR4 and DDR5 kits are scored on separate scales, so these two scores can't be compared directly. Your motherboard supports only one of the two.
DDR Generation
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DDR4
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C40
- DDR5
Brand
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C40
- Corsair
Part Number
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C40
- CMK32GX5M2B6000C40
CAS Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 22Best
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C40
- 40-82%
Module Count
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 1
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C40
- 2
RAM Segment
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Industrial/Embedded
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C40
- Desktop DDR5
Form Factor
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DIMM
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C40
- Desktop DIMM
Platform Optimisation
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- JEDEC Only
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C40
- AM5
Capacity Per Module
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 16 GB
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C40
- 16 GB
True Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 13.8 ns-4%
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C40
- 13.3 nsBest
Peak Bandwidth
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 25.6 GB/s-73%
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C40
- 96.0 GB/sBest
Which one should you pick?
Choose ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ if you want the lower CAS latency (22 vs 40) and the higher capacity per module (16 GB vs 16 GB).
Choose Corsair CMK32GX5M2B6000C40 if you want the lower true latency (13.3 ns vs 13.8 ns) and the higher peak bandwidth (96.0 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s).