Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6200C36: Comparison
What is the difference between ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ and Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6200C36?
The gap that matters here is cas latency: ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ 22 against Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6200C36 36, which puts ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ 64% ahead. Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6200C36 also leads on peak bandwidth, 25.6 GB/s on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 99.2 GB/s on the Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6200C36. Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6200C36 also leads on true latency, 13.8 ns on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 11.6 ns on the Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6200C36. Ddr generation is not the same on both, DDR4 on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus DDR5 on the Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6200C36. They differ on module count too, 1 on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 2 on the Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6200C36. There is a split on ram segment as well, Industrial/Embedded on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DDR5 on the Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6200C36. Form factor is not the same on both, DIMM on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DIMM on the Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6200C36. They differ on platform optimisation too, JEDEC Only on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus AM5 on the Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6200C36.
Who each one is for
it is not the pick for manual timing tuning: memory chips are not disclosed and adding a second kit later for four sticks.
Where the two are identical
The common ground is wider than the gap: capacity per module are identical here.
Specs and benchmarks
Speed Score
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- –
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6200C36
- 7.8/10
DDR4 and DDR5 kits are scored on separate scales, so these two scores can't be compared directly. Your motherboard supports only one of the two.
DDR Generation
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DDR4
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6200C36
- DDR5
Brand
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6200C36
- Corsair
Part Number
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6200C36
- CMK32GX5M2E6200C36
CAS Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 22Best
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6200C36
- 36-64%
Module Count
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 1
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6200C36
- 2
RAM Segment
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Industrial/Embedded
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6200C36
- Desktop DDR5
Form Factor
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DIMM
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6200C36
- Desktop DIMM
Platform Optimisation
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- JEDEC Only
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6200C36
- AM5
Capacity Per Module
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 16 GB
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6200C36
- 16 GB
True Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 13.8 ns-19%
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6200C36
- 11.6 nsBest
Peak Bandwidth
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 25.6 GB/s-74%
- Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6200C36
- 99.2 GB/sBest
Which one should you pick?
Choose ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ if you want the lower CAS latency (22 vs 36) and the higher capacity per module (16 GB vs 16 GB).
Choose Corsair CMK32GX5M2E6200C36 if you want the lower true latency (11.6 ns vs 13.8 ns) and the higher peak bandwidth (99.2 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s).