Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs Corsair CMK64GX5M2X6800C32 64GB: Comparison
ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs Corsair CMK64GX5M2X6800C32 64GB capacity per module compared
The gap that matters here is capacity per module: ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ 16 GB against Corsair CMK64GX5M2X6800C32 64GB 32 GB, which puts Corsair CMK64GX5M2X6800C32 64GB 50% ahead. ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ also leads on cas latency, 22 on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 32 on the Corsair CMK64GX5M2X6800C32 64GB. Corsair CMK64GX5M2X6800C32 64GB also leads on true latency, 13.8 ns on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 9.4 ns on the Corsair CMK64GX5M2X6800C32 64GB. Add peak bandwidth to that, 25.6 GB/s on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 108.8 GB/s on the Corsair CMK64GX5M2X6800C32 64GB, and the pattern holds. They differ on ddr generation too, DDR4 on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus DDR5 on the Corsair CMK64GX5M2X6800C32 64GB. There is a split on module count as well, 1 on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 2 on the Corsair CMK64GX5M2X6800C32 64GB. Ram segment is not the same on both, Industrial/Embedded on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DDR5 on the Corsair CMK64GX5M2X6800C32 64GB. They differ on form factor too, DIMM on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DIMM on the Corsair CMK64GX5M2X6800C32 64GB. Platform optimisation is not the same on both, JEDEC Only on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Intel on the Corsair CMK64GX5M2X6800C32 64GB.
Which should you buy, ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ or Corsair CMK64GX5M2X6800C32 64GB?
The Corsair CMK64GX5M2X6800C32 64GB is the one to take for Intel builds wanting maximum 64GB bandwidth and low latency and AM5 boards specifically validated for 6800MT/s and above, though it is not built for anyone wanting RGB lighting. It is not the one for typical AM5 gaming builds, CMK64GX5M2B6000C30 at 6000MT/s CL30 is the better real-world performer.
Specs and benchmarks
Speed Score
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- –
- Corsair CMK64GX5M2X6800C32 64GB
- 9.0/10
DDR4 and DDR5 kits are scored on separate scales, so these two scores can't be compared directly. Your motherboard supports only one of the two.
DDR Generation
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DDR4
- Corsair CMK64GX5M2X6800C32 64GB
- DDR5
Brand
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA
- Corsair CMK64GX5M2X6800C32 64GB
- Corsair
Part Number
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Corsair CMK64GX5M2X6800C32 64GB
- CMK64GX5M2X6800C32
CAS Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 22Best
- Corsair CMK64GX5M2X6800C32 64GB
- 32-45%
Module Count
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 1
- Corsair CMK64GX5M2X6800C32 64GB
- 2
RAM Segment
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Industrial/Embedded
- Corsair CMK64GX5M2X6800C32 64GB
- Desktop DDR5
Form Factor
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DIMM
- Corsair CMK64GX5M2X6800C32 64GB
- Desktop DIMM
Platform Optimisation
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- JEDEC Only
- Corsair CMK64GX5M2X6800C32 64GB
- Intel
Capacity Per Module
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 16 GB-50%
- Corsair CMK64GX5M2X6800C32 64GB
- 32 GBBest
True Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 13.8 ns-47%
- Corsair CMK64GX5M2X6800C32 64GB
- 9.4 nsBest
Peak Bandwidth
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 25.6 GB/s-76%
- Corsair CMK64GX5M2X6800C32 64GB
- 108.8 GB/sBest
Which one should you pick?
Choose ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ if you want the lower CAS latency (22 vs 32).
Choose Corsair CMK64GX5M2X6800C32 64GB if you want the higher capacity per module (32 GB vs 16 GB), the lower true latency (9.4 ns vs 13.8 ns) and the higher peak bandwidth (108.8 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s).