Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs Corsair Dominator Titanium CMP32GX5M2X8000C38: Comparison

ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs Corsair Dominator Titanium cas latency compared

Cas latency is where these two genuinely part company, ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ 22 against Corsair Dominator Titanium 38, a 73% lead for ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ. True latency runs the same way, 13.8 ns on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 9.5 ns on the Corsair Dominator Titanium, another win for Corsair Dominator Titanium. Add peak bandwidth to that, 25.6 GB/s on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 128.0 GB/s on the Corsair Dominator Titanium, and the pattern holds. Ddr generation is not the same on both, DDR4 on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus DDR5 on the Corsair Dominator Titanium. Module count is not the same on both, 1 on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 2 on the Corsair Dominator Titanium. There is a split on ram segment as well, Industrial/Embedded on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DDR5 on the Corsair Dominator Titanium. There is a split on form factor as well, DIMM on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus UDIMM on the Corsair Dominator Titanium. They differ on platform optimisation too, JEDEC Only on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Intel on the Corsair Dominator Titanium.

ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs Corsair Dominator Titanium: which one fits your build

The Corsair Dominator Titanium is the one to take for extreme overclockers and flagship builds chasing top DDR5 speeds, though it is not the pick for budget-conscious buyers and DDR4 systems.

What ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ and Corsair Dominator Titanium have in common

Where they agree, they agree completely, capacity per module and warranty included, so the decision does not turn on any of those.

Specs and benchmarks

  • Speed Score

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    –
    Corsair Dominator Titanium CMP32GX5M2X8000C38
    9.5/10

    DDR4 and DDR5 kits are scored on separate scales, so these two scores can't be compared directly. Your motherboard supports only one of the two.

  • DDR Generation

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    DDR4
    Corsair Dominator Titanium CMP32GX5M2X8000C38
    DDR5
  • Brand

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    ADATA
    Corsair Dominator Titanium CMP32GX5M2X8000C38
    Corsair
  • Part Number

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    Corsair Dominator Titanium CMP32GX5M2X8000C38
    CMP32GX5M2X8000C38
  • Series

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    ADATA Industrial
    Corsair Dominator Titanium CMP32GX5M2X8000C38
    Dominator Titanium
  • CAS Latency

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    22Best
    Corsair Dominator Titanium CMP32GX5M2X8000C38
    38-73%
  • Module Count

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    1
    Corsair Dominator Titanium CMP32GX5M2X8000C38
    2
  • RAM Segment

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    Industrial/Embedded
    Corsair Dominator Titanium CMP32GX5M2X8000C38
    Desktop DDR5
  • Form Factor

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    DIMM
    Corsair Dominator Titanium CMP32GX5M2X8000C38
    UDIMM
  • Platform Optimisation

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    JEDEC Only
    Corsair Dominator Titanium CMP32GX5M2X8000C38
    Intel
  • Capacity Per Module

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    16 GB
    Corsair Dominator Titanium CMP32GX5M2X8000C38
    16 GB
  • True Latency

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    13.8 ns-45%
    Corsair Dominator Titanium CMP32GX5M2X8000C38
    9.5 nsBest
  • Warranty

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    Limited Lifetime
    Corsair Dominator Titanium CMP32GX5M2X8000C38
    Limited Lifetime
  • Peak Bandwidth

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    25.6 GB/s-80%
    Corsair Dominator Titanium CMP32GX5M2X8000C38
    128.0 GB/sBest

    Which one should you pick?

    Choose ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ if you want the lower CAS latency (22 vs 38) and the higher capacity per module (16 GB vs 16 GB).

    Choose Corsair Dominator Titanium CMP32GX5M2X8000C38 if you want the lower true latency (9.5 ns vs 13.8 ns) and the higher peak bandwidth (128.0 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s).