Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs Corsair Dominator Titanium CMP96GX5M2X8000C38: Comparison

What is the difference between ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ and Corsair Dominator Titanium?

Start with capacity per module, because it is the widest measured gap between them: ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ 16 GB against Corsair Dominator Titanium 48 GB, 67% in favour of Corsair Dominator Titanium. Cas latency runs the same way, 22 on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 38 on the Corsair Dominator Titanium, another win for ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ. True latency runs the same way, 13.8 ns on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 9.5 ns on the Corsair Dominator Titanium, another win for Corsair Dominator Titanium. Add peak bandwidth to that, 25.6 GB/s on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 128.0 GB/s on the Corsair Dominator Titanium, and the pattern holds. They differ on ddr generation too, DDR4 on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus DDR5 on the Corsair Dominator Titanium. Module count is not the same on both, 1 on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 2 on the Corsair Dominator Titanium. There is a split on ram segment as well, Industrial/Embedded on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DDR5 on the Corsair Dominator Titanium. They differ on form factor too, DIMM on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus UDIMM on the Corsair Dominator Titanium. They differ on platform optimisation too, JEDEC Only on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Intel on the Corsair Dominator Titanium.

Who each one is for

The Corsair Dominator Titanium suits extreme overclockers and flagship builds chasing top DDR5 speeds, though it is the wrong buy for budget-conscious buyers and DDR4 systems.

What ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ and Corsair Dominator Titanium have in common

The common ground is wider than the gap: warranty are identical here.

Specs and benchmarks

  • Speed Score

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    –
    Corsair Dominator Titanium CMP96GX5M2X8000C38
    9.5/10

    DDR4 and DDR5 kits are scored on separate scales, so these two scores can't be compared directly. Your motherboard supports only one of the two.

  • DDR Generation

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    DDR4
    Corsair Dominator Titanium CMP96GX5M2X8000C38
    DDR5
  • Brand

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    ADATA
    Corsair Dominator Titanium CMP96GX5M2X8000C38
    Corsair
  • Part Number

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    Corsair Dominator Titanium CMP96GX5M2X8000C38
    CMP96GX5M2X8000C38
  • Series

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    ADATA Industrial
    Corsair Dominator Titanium CMP96GX5M2X8000C38
    Dominator Titanium
  • CAS Latency

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    22Best
    Corsair Dominator Titanium CMP96GX5M2X8000C38
    38-73%
  • Module Count

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    1
    Corsair Dominator Titanium CMP96GX5M2X8000C38
    2
  • RAM Segment

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    Industrial/Embedded
    Corsair Dominator Titanium CMP96GX5M2X8000C38
    Desktop DDR5
  • Form Factor

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    DIMM
    Corsair Dominator Titanium CMP96GX5M2X8000C38
    UDIMM
  • Platform Optimisation

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    JEDEC Only
    Corsair Dominator Titanium CMP96GX5M2X8000C38
    Intel
  • Capacity Per Module

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    16 GB-67%
    Corsair Dominator Titanium CMP96GX5M2X8000C38
    48 GBBest
  • True Latency

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    13.8 ns-45%
    Corsair Dominator Titanium CMP96GX5M2X8000C38
    9.5 nsBest
  • Warranty

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    Limited Lifetime
    Corsair Dominator Titanium CMP96GX5M2X8000C38
    Limited Lifetime
  • Peak Bandwidth

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    25.6 GB/s-80%
    Corsair Dominator Titanium CMP96GX5M2X8000C38
    128.0 GB/sBest

    Which one should you pick?

    Choose ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ if you want the lower CAS latency (22 vs 38).

    Choose Corsair Dominator Titanium CMP96GX5M2X8000C38 if you want the higher capacity per module (48 GB vs 16 GB), the lower true latency (9.5 ns vs 13.8 ns) and the higher peak bandwidth (128.0 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s).