Consumercarts

Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more

ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB F5-6400J3039G16G 16GB DDR5-6400 CL30: Comparison

ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB true latency compared

On true latency the spread is 47%, ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ 13.8 ns against G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB 9.4 ns, so G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB takes it. ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ also leads on cas latency, 22 on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 30 on the G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB. Add peak bandwidth to that, 25.6 GB/s on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 51.2 GB/s on the G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB, and the pattern holds. There is a split on ddr generation as well, DDR4 on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus DDR5 on the G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB. They differ on ram segment too, Industrial/Embedded on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DDR5 on the G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB. There is a split on form factor as well, DIMM on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DIMM on the G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB. There is a split on platform optimisation as well, JEDEC Only on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Neither on the G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB.

ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB: which one fits your build

Buy the G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB for Intel platforms without AM5's fabric-ratio ceiling. It is equally the pick for AM5 builds on boards confirmed to hold 1:1 timing at 6400MT/s. Avoid it for AM5 builds on unconfirmed boards, where 6000MT/s CL30 is the safer sweet spot.

Where the two are identical

Everything else lines up. Capacity per module and module count read the same on both, so those are not worth weighing.

Specs and benchmarks

  • Speed Score

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    –
    G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB F5-6400J3039G16G 16GB DDR5-6400 CL30
    9.3/10

    DDR4 and DDR5 kits are scored on separate scales, so these two scores can't be compared directly. Your motherboard supports only one of the two.

  • DDR Generation

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    DDR4
    G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB F5-6400J3039G16G 16GB DDR5-6400 CL30
    DDR5
  • Brand

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    ADATA
    G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB F5-6400J3039G16G 16GB DDR5-6400 CL30
    G.Skill
  • Part Number

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB F5-6400J3039G16G 16GB DDR5-6400 CL30
    F5-6400J3039G16G
  • Series

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    ADATA Industrial
    G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB F5-6400J3039G16G 16GB DDR5-6400 CL30
    Trident Z5 Neo RGB
  • CAS Latency

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    22Best
    G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB F5-6400J3039G16G 16GB DDR5-6400 CL30
    30-36%
  • Module Count

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    1
    G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB F5-6400J3039G16G 16GB DDR5-6400 CL30
    1
  • RAM Segment

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    Industrial/Embedded
    G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB F5-6400J3039G16G 16GB DDR5-6400 CL30
    Desktop DDR5
  • Form Factor

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    DIMM
    G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB F5-6400J3039G16G 16GB DDR5-6400 CL30
    Desktop DIMM
  • Platform Optimisation

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    JEDEC Only
    G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB F5-6400J3039G16G 16GB DDR5-6400 CL30
    Neither
  • Capacity Per Module

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    16 GB
    G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB F5-6400J3039G16G 16GB DDR5-6400 CL30
    16 GB
  • True Latency

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    13.8 ns-47%
    G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB F5-6400J3039G16G 16GB DDR5-6400 CL30
    9.4 nsBest
  • Peak Bandwidth

    ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
    25.6 GB/s-50%
    G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB F5-6400J3039G16G 16GB DDR5-6400 CL30
    51.2 GB/sBest

    Which one should you pick?

    Choose ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ if you want the lower CAS latency (22 vs 30) and the higher capacity per module (16 GB vs 16 GB).

    Choose G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB F5-6400J3039G16G 16GB DDR5-6400 CL30 if you want the lower true latency (9.4 ns vs 13.8 ns) and the higher peak bandwidth (51.2 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s).