Consumercarts is reader-supported. Learn more
ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs Gigabyte GP-ARS32G52D5: Comparison
ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ vs Gigabyte GP-ARS32G52D5 cas latency compared
Start with cas latency, because it is the widest measured gap between them: ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ 22 against Gigabyte GP-ARS32G52D5 40, 82% in favour of ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ. Add total capacity to that, 16 GB on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 32 GB on the Gigabyte GP-ARS32G52D5, and the pattern holds. Add peak bandwidth to that, 25.6 GB/s on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 83.2 GB/s on the Gigabyte GP-ARS32G52D5, and the pattern holds. Rated speed is closer, 3200 MT/s on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 5200 MT/s on the Gigabyte GP-ARS32G52D5. Add true latency to that, 13.8 ns on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 15.4 ns on the Gigabyte GP-ARS32G52D5, and the pattern holds. They differ on rated voltage too, 1.2 V on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 1.35 V on the Gigabyte GP-ARS32G52D5. Ddr generation is not the same on both, DDR4 on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus DDR5 on the Gigabyte GP-ARS32G52D5. There is a split on module count as well, 1 on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus 2 on the Gigabyte GP-ARS32G52D5. There is a split on ram segment as well, Industrial/Embedded on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Desktop DDR5 on the Gigabyte GP-ARS32G52D5.
Who each one is for
Buy the Gigabyte GP-ARS32G52D5 for clean builds without RGB, though it is not built for adding a second kit later for four sticks. Avoid it for latency-focused builds: 93% of desktop DDR5 kits are as tight or tighter.
What ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ and Gigabyte GP-ARS32G52D5 have in common
Everything else lines up. Capacity per module, form factor and warranty read the same on both, so those are not worth weighing.
Frequently asked questions
Do the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ and Gigabyte GP-ARS32G52D5 differ on platform optimisation?
Yes. Platform Optimisation reads JEDEC Only on the ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ versus Intel XMP on the Gigabyte GP-ARS32G52D5.
Specs and benchmarks
Speed Score
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- –
- Gigabyte GP-ARS32G52D5
- 5.5/10
DDR4 and DDR5 kits are scored on separate scales, so these two scores can't be compared directly. Your motherboard supports only one of the two.
DDR Generation
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DDR4
- Gigabyte GP-ARS32G52D5
- DDR5
Brand
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA
- Gigabyte GP-ARS32G52D5
- Gigabyte
Part Number
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Gigabyte GP-ARS32G52D5
- GP-ARS32G52D5
Series
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- ADATA Industrial
- Gigabyte GP-ARS32G52D5
- AORUS
CAS Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 22Best
- Gigabyte GP-ARS32G52D5
- 40-82%
Module Count
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 1
- Gigabyte GP-ARS32G52D5
- 2
RAM Segment
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Industrial/Embedded
- Gigabyte GP-ARS32G52D5
- Desktop DDR5
Form Factor
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- DIMM
- Gigabyte GP-ARS32G52D5
- DIMM
Platform Optimisation
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- JEDEC Only
- Gigabyte GP-ARS32G52D5
- Intel XMP
Total Capacity
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 16 GB-50%
- Gigabyte GP-ARS32G52D5
- 32 GBBest
Capacity Per Module
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 16 GB
- Gigabyte GP-ARS32G52D5
- 16 GB
Kit Type
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Single Module
- Gigabyte GP-ARS32G52D5
- Dual Channel Kit
Rated Speed
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 3200 MT/s
- Gigabyte GP-ARS32G52D5
- 5200 MT/sBest
True Latency
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 13.8 nsBest
- Gigabyte GP-ARS32G52D5
- 15.4 ns-12%
Rated Voltage
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 1.2 V
- Gigabyte GP-ARS32G52D5
- 1.35 V
Warranty
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- Limited Lifetime
- Gigabyte GP-ARS32G52D5
- Limited Lifetime
Peak Bandwidth
- ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ
- 25.6 GB/s-69%
- Gigabyte GP-ARS32G52D5
- 83.2 GB/sBest
Which one should you pick?
Choose ADATA AD4U3200716G22-BADZ if you want the lower CAS latency (22 vs 40), the higher capacity per module (16 GB vs 16 GB) and the lower true latency (13.8 ns vs 15.4 ns).
Choose Gigabyte GP-ARS32G52D5 if you want the higher total capacity (32 GB vs 16 GB) and the higher peak bandwidth (83.2 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s).